Torfason T, Kiger R, Selvig K A, Egelberg J
J Clin Periodontol. 1979 Jun;6(3):165-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1979.tb02196.x.
A study utilizing a split-mouth design in 18 subjects and with four operators was performed in order to compare the effect of hand and ultrasonic instrumentation of periodontal pockets. Contralateral pairs of teeth with pockets of comparable depth were treated by either hand or ultrasonic instruments. Instrumentation was repeated after 4 weeks. Pocket depth, bleeding on probing and gingival fluid measurements were used for evaluation. A gradual reduction of pocket depth and number of bleeding points took place throughout the 8-week experimental period. Clinically significant differences were not observed comparing the effect of hand instruments to ultrasonics for any of the operators. The amounts of gingival fluid were similar for both methods of instrumentation at the final examination. Thus, the present study failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the effect of ultrasonic root debridement and hand instrumentation in the treatment of 4-6 mm deep periodontal pockets.
一项针对18名受试者并由4名操作人员采用双侧对照设计的研究开展,目的是比较手动器械和超声器械用于牙周袋治疗的效果。具有可比深度牙周袋的对侧牙齿分别用手动器械或超声器械进行治疗。4周后重复进行器械治疗。采用牙周袋深度、探诊出血和龈沟液测量进行评估。在整个8周的实验期内,牙周袋深度和出血点数量逐渐减少。对于任何操作人员而言,比较手动器械和超声器械的效果时未观察到具有临床意义的差异。在最终检查时,两种器械治疗方法的龈沟液量相似。因此,本研究未能证明在治疗4 - 6毫米深的牙周袋时,超声根面清创术和手动器械治疗效果之间存在任何显著差异。