Than A, Duguid R, McKendrick A J
J Clin Periodontol. 1982 May;9(3):193-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb02059.x.
Two hundred and forty stained extracted teeth with a restoration on one proximal surface and with no restoration on the opposite surface were investigated for the position and quality of the restoration and the position of the periodontal attachment. Only 27% of restorations were of good quality, 60% had overhangs and 13% deficiencies. The mean difference in loss of periodontal attachment (LOA) between the two surfaces for all teeth was 0.36 mm when the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the periodontal membrane on the unrestored surfaces was subtracted from that on the restored surfaces. If allowance is made for those restorations located apical to the cemento-enamel junction, the LOA difference was 0.18 mm.
对240颗已拔除的牙齿进行了研究,这些牙齿的一个邻面有修复体,相对面无修复体,研究内容包括修复体的位置和质量以及牙周附着的位置。只有27%的修复体质量良好,60%有悬突,13%有缺陷。当从修复面的牙骨质-釉质界到牙周膜的距离中减去未修复面的该距离时,所有牙齿两个面之间牙周附着丧失(LOA)的平均差异为0.36mm。如果考虑那些位于牙骨质-釉质界根尖侧的修复体,则LOA差异为0.18mm。