Suppr超能文献

[评估用于诊断新生儿败血症的各种实验室检查]

[Evaluation of various laboratory tests for the diagnosis of septicemia in the newborn infant].

作者信息

Vargas Origel A, Gutiérrez L J, Lara Guzmán M, Domínguez Camacho C

出版信息

Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1980 Nov-Dec;37(6):1135-40.

PMID:6970581
Abstract

In order to evaluate the usefulness of some laboratory studies in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, a prospective study was done in 56 patients: Group I (n = 19) with a single infectious site, group II (n = 16) with two infectious sites and group III (n = 21) with two infectious sites and positive blood culture. All of them had platelet count, erythrosedimentation rate (ESR), alpha-1-antitrypsin, orosomucoid, and C-reactive protein made; according to the results we gave an arbitrary low score when it was between 0 and 2 high when it reached 3 to 6 points. During the acute phase of the illness, 86% of the infants of group III, 69% of group II and 5% of group I had a high score. Even though the diagnostic possibilities were increased with the use of alpha-1-antitrypsin, orosomucoid and C-reactive protein, we think that these laboratory studies are not more useful than platelet count and ESR in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

摘要

为了评估一些实验室检查在新生儿败血症诊断中的作用,对56例患者进行了一项前瞻性研究:第一组(n = 19)有单个感染部位,第二组(n = 16)有两个感染部位,第三组(n = 21)有两个感染部位且血培养阳性。对所有患者均进行了血小板计数、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、α-1-抗胰蛋白酶、类粘蛋白和C反应蛋白检测;根据结果,当数值在0至2分时给予任意低评分,当达到3至6分时给予高评分。在疾病急性期,第三组86%的婴儿、第二组69%的婴儿和第一组5%的婴儿评分较高。尽管使用α-1-抗胰蛋白酶、类粘蛋白和C反应蛋白可提高诊断可能性,但我们认为这些实验室检查在新生儿败血症诊断中并不比血小板计数和ESR更有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验