• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉手术协作研究(CASS)中手术死亡率的临床及血管造影预测因素

Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS).

作者信息

Kennedy J W, Kaiser G C, Fisher L D, Fritz J K, Myers W, Mudd J G, Ryan T J

出版信息

Circulation. 1981 Apr;63(4):793-802. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.4.793.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.63.4.793
PMID:6970631
Abstract

Fifteen institutions participating in the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS) have performed isolated coronary artery bypass surgery upon 6630 patients (1061 women and 5569 men) for coronary artery disease. The overall operative mortality (OM) was 2.3% (range 0.3-6.4%). Mortality increased with age, from 0 in the group 20-29 years old to 7.9% in the group 70 years and older. OM was higher for women in each group, ranging from 2.8% for ages 30-39 years to 12.3% for age 70 years and older (0.8% and 5.8% for men). Clinical manifestations of congestive heart failure were associated with increased OM. Mortality was 1.4% in one-vessel, 2.1% in two-vessel and 2.8% in three-vessel disease (diameter narrowing greater than or equal to 70%). Among 1019 patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis, OM ranged from 1.6% in patients with mild stenosis and a right-dominant system to 25% in patients with severe (greater than or equal to 90%) stenosis and left dominance. OM varied with ejection fraction (EF) (1.9% for EF greater than or equal to 50% to 6.7% for EF less than 19%) and left ventricular wall motion score (1.7% for least abnormal to 9.1% for most abnormal). For elective surgery, OM was 1.7%, for urgent surgery 3.5%, and for emergency surgery 10.8%. Mortality was 40.0% among 30 patients with severe LMCA stenosis who underwent emergency revascularization. Advanced age, female sex, symptoms of heart failure, LMCA stenosis, impaired left ventricular function and nonelective surgery are associated with a higher OM. These factors should be considered in the selection of patients for coronary artery surgery.

摘要

参与冠状动脉手术协作研究(CASS)的15家机构已对6630例冠心病患者(1061例女性和5569例男性)进行了单纯冠状动脉搭桥手术。总体手术死亡率(OM)为2.3%(范围0.3 - 6.4%)。死亡率随年龄增加,从20 - 29岁组的0%增至70岁及以上组的7.9%。每组女性的OM更高,从30 - 39岁组的2.8%到70岁及以上组的12.3%(男性为0.8%和5.8%)。充血性心力衰竭的临床表现与OM增加相关。单支血管病变患者的死亡率为1.4%,双支血管病变患者为2.1%,三支血管病变患者(直径狭窄大于或等于70%)为2.8%。在1019例左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)狭窄患者中,OM范围从轻度狭窄且为右优势系统患者的1.6%到重度(大于或等于90%)狭窄且为左优势系统患者的25%。OM随射血分数(EF)而变化(EF大于或等于50%时为1.9%,EF小于19%时为6.7%)以及左心室壁运动评分(最正常时为1.7%,最异常时为9.1%)。择期手术的OM为1.7%,急诊手术为3.5%,紧急手术为10.8%。30例接受紧急血运重建的重度LMCA狭窄患者的死亡率为40.0%。高龄、女性、心力衰竭症状、LMCA狭窄、左心室功能受损和非择期手术与较高的OM相关。在选择冠状动脉手术患者时应考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS).冠状动脉手术协作研究(CASS)中手术死亡率的临床及血管造影预测因素
Circulation. 1981 Apr;63(4):793-802. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.4.793.
2
Multivariate discriminant analysis of the clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS).冠状动脉外科合作研究(CASS)中手术死亡率的临床和血管造影预测因素的多变量判别分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Dec;80(6):876-87.
3
[Comparison of the cumulative survival among patient groups with a left main coronary artery lesion after surgical and therapeutic treatment].
Kardiologiia. 1982 Feb;22(2):53-7.
4
Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry.冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)登记处的手术生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Sep;40(3):245-60. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60037-9.
5
Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS).冠状动脉搭桥手术对左主干冠状动脉疾病患者亚组生存模式的影响。冠状动脉搭桥手术协作研究(CASS)报告。
Am J Cardiol. 1981 Oct;48(4):765-77. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90156-9.
6
Prospective evaluation of coronary arteries: influence on operative risk in coronary artery surgery.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Oct;16(4):429-34. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00295-x.
7
[Long-term results of surgical coronary vessel intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular function].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Aug 18;120(33):1175-9.
8
Predictors of operative mortality for coronary bypass grafting in patients with ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术的手术死亡率预测因素。
Yale J Biol Med. 1978 Jan-Feb;51(1):27-36.
9
Is left main coronary artery stenosis a risk factor for early mortality in coronary artery surgery?
J Card Surg. 2000 May-Jun;15(3):217-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb00459.x.
10
Prediction of coronary artery disease by left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities in patients with stenosis of the aortic valve.主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室局部壁运动异常对冠状动脉疾病的预测
Br Heart J. 1987 Mar;57(3):237-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.3.237.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in State-of-the-Art Management for Left Main Disease.左主干病变的最新管理中的性别差异。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug;4(8):102009. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102009.
2
Association of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio and long-term outcome among women with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: filling gaps in female.冠状动脉搭桥手术女性患者血尿素氮与肌酐比值与长期预后的关联:填补女性研究空白
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Aug 7;26(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04283-0.
3
Clinical Significance of Coronary Arterial Dominance: A Review of the Literature.
冠状动脉优势的临床意义:文献综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e032851. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032851. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
4
The Appropriateness of Medical Devices Is Strongly Influenced by Sex and Gender.医疗设备的适用性受到性别和性别的强烈影响。
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;14(2):234. doi: 10.3390/life14020234.
5
Sex differences in coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes: a narrative review.冠状动脉搭桥手术结果中的性别差异:一项叙述性综述。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):5041-5054. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-294. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
The Gender Gap in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis of Risk and Outcomes.主动脉夹层的性别差异:风险与结局的前瞻性分析
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2023 Jul 31;9(3):178-186. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2023-0024. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Sex differences in coronary artery bypass grafting-related morbidity and mortality.冠状动脉搭桥术相关发病率和死亡率的性别差异。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 29;9:1021363. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1021363. eCollection 2022.
8
Sex Differences in Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Left Main Disease: From the DELTA Registries.左主干疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的性别差异:来自 DELTA 注册研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e022320. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022320. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
Update: Gender differences in CABG outcomes-Have we bridged the gap?更新:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)结局中的性别差异——我们是否已经弥合了差距?
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0255170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255170. eCollection 2021.
10
Prognostic value of anatomical dominance of coronary circulation in patients with surgical myocardial revascularization.外科心肌血运重建患者冠状动脉循环解剖优势的预后价值。
Med Arch. 2015 Feb;69(1):6-9. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.6-9. Epub 2015 Feb 21.