• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)登记处的手术生存率。

Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry.

作者信息

Myers W O, Davis K, Foster E D, Maynard C, Kaiser G C

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Sep;40(3):245-60. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60037-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60037-9
PMID:3876085
Abstract

The overall surgical survival data in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry have not been published to date, pending the report of the randomized medical-surgical comparison (CASS randomized trial). Non-randomized surgical survival data from the CASS registry are given in this article. The overall medical survival data from the registry were reported previously as a natural history study. There were 8,991 patients in the registry portion of CASS who had primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and 8,971 with follow-up of more than 30 days. The 5-year survival for all 8,971 patients was 90%, and the operative mortality was 2.37%. Patients with left main coronary artery disease had an operative mortality of 3.84% and a 5-year survival of 85%, while patients with lesions in other vessels had an operative mortality of 2.12% and a 5-year survival of 91%. Among patients without left main coronary disease, the 5-year survival was 93% in those with single-vessel and 92% in those with double-vessel disease (operative mortality was 1.50% and 1.92%, respectively) and 88% in patients with triple-vessel disease (operative mortality was 2.62%; p = 0.009). When results for patients with left main coronary artery obstruction were compared with those for triple-vessel disease, the 5-year survival figures were 85% and 88%, respectively (p = 0.02) and the operative mortality, 3.84% and 2.62%, respectively (p = 0.03). Patients with normal or nearly normal left ventricular (LV) function (i.e., LV segmental wall motion scores ranging from 5 through 11) had a 5-year survival of 92% and an operative mortality of 1.97%. Patients with moderate impairment (LV score range, 12 through 16) had a 5-year survival of 80% and an operative mortality of 4.21%. In those with poor ventricular function (LV score of 17 or greater), the 5-year survival was 65% and the operative mortality was 6.21%. The difference in survival among the three groups was significant (p less than 0.0001). Of 29 variables used in a stepwise Cox regression analysis, LV wall motion score, congestive heart failure score, age, number of operable vessels, smoking history, LV end-diastolic pressure, and percent of left main coronary artery stenosis were found to have a significant effect on long-term survival (excluding 30-day mortality), and these variables plus surgical priority and height influenced surgical mortality. When height was used in the Cox proportional hazards model, female sex was no longer a significant variable.

摘要

冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)登记处的总体手术生存数据至今尚未公布,有待随机药物-手术对照研究(CASS随机试验)的报告。本文给出了CASS登记处的非随机手术生存数据。该登记处的总体药物生存数据先前已作为一项自然史研究报告。CASS登记部分有8991例患者接受了原发性单纯冠状动脉搭桥术,其中8971例有超过30天的随访。所有8971例患者的5年生存率为90%,手术死亡率为2.37%。左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的手术死亡率为3.84%,5年生存率为85%,而其他血管病变患者的手术死亡率为2.12%,5年生存率为91%。在无左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者中,单支血管病变患者的5年生存率为93%,双支血管病变患者为92%(手术死亡率分别为1.50%和1.92%),三支血管病变患者为88%(手术死亡率为2.62%;p = 0.009)。将左主干冠状动脉阻塞患者的结果与三支血管病变患者的结果进行比较时,5年生存率分别为85%和88%(p = 0.02),手术死亡率分别为3.84%和2.62%(p = 0.03)。左心室(LV)功能正常或接近正常的患者(即LV节段壁运动评分在5至11之间)5年生存率为92%,手术死亡率为1.97%。中度受损患者(LV评分范围为12至16)5年生存率为80%,手术死亡率为4.21%。心室功能差的患者(LV评分为17或更高)5年生存率为65%,手术死亡率为6.21%。三组之间的生存差异具有显著性(p < 0.0001)。在逐步Cox回归分析中使用的29个变量中,LV壁运动评分、充血性心力衰竭评分、年龄、可手术血管数量、吸烟史、LV舒张末期压力和左主干冠状动脉狭窄百分比被发现对长期生存(不包括30天死亡率)有显著影响,这些变量加上手术优先级和身高影响手术死亡率。当在Cox比例风险模型中使用身高时,女性性别不再是一个显著变量。

相似文献

1
Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry.冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)登记处的手术生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Sep;40(3):245-60. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60037-9.
2
Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.左主干等效冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与药物治疗组生存率的比较。冠心病外科研究(CASS)长期经验。
Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2335-44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2335.
3
Medical versus early surgical therapy in patients with triple-vessel disease and mild angina pectoris: a CASS registry study of survival.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1987 Nov;44(5):471-86. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62104-2.
4
Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者手术组与内科治疗组生存率的比较。冠状动脉搭桥手术长期临床研究(CASS)经验。
Circulation. 1995 May 1;91(9):2325-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.9.2325.
5
Improved survival of surgically treated patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease and severe angina pectoris. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Apr;97(4):487-95.
6
Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry.冠状动脉手术研究(CASS)登记中接受药物治疗患者的生存率。
Circulation. 1982 Sep;66(3):562-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.562.
7
Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): comparability of 10 year survival in randomized and randomizable patients.冠状动脉手术研究(CASS):随机分组和可随机分组患者10年生存率的可比性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(5):1071-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90534-v.
8
Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS).冠状动脉搭桥手术对左主干冠状动脉疾病患者亚组生存模式的影响。冠状动脉搭桥手术协作研究(CASS)报告。
Am J Cardiol. 1981 Oct;48(4):765-77. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90156-9.
9
Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.冠状动脉手术研究(CASS)登记处接受药物治疗患者的长期生存情况。
Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2645-57. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2645.
10
Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.血管重建完整性对接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的三支血管病变患者长期预后的影响。冠状动脉手术研究(CASS)注册报告。
Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):446-57. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.2.446.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review.微创与机器人冠状动脉旁路移植术——25年回顾
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1922-1944. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1535.
2
The EXCEL Trial: The Interventionalists' Perspective.EXCEL试验:介入医生的观点。
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Mar 2;16:e01. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.32. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Optimizing the management of elderly colorectal surgery patients.优化老年结直肠外科手术患者的管理。
Surg Today. 2010 Nov;40(11):999-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4354-5. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
4
Aortic valve replacement for patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.对于接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的轻至中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行主动脉瓣置换。
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Mar;23(3):141-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230303.
5
Incidence, risk, and outcome of reintervention after aortocoronary bypass surgery.主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术后再次干预的发生率、风险及结果。
Br Heart J. 1987 May;57(5):427-35. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.5.427.
6
Coronary revascularization rather than cardiac transplantation for chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.对于慢性缺血性心肌病,应选择冠状动脉血运重建而非心脏移植。
Ann Surg. 1989 Sep;210(3):348-52; discussion 352-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198909000-00011.
7
Management of acute coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: experience of complications in a hospital without on site facilities for cardiac surgery.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术期间急性冠状动脉闭塞的管理:在一家没有现场心脏外科手术设施的医院中的并发症经验
BMJ. 1990 Feb 10;300(6721):355-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6721.355.
8
Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术前后生活质量的前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 1991 Mar 2;302(6775):511-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6775.511.
9
The treatment of coronary artery disease in the elderly.老年人冠状动脉疾病的治疗
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991 Apr;5(2):449-55. doi: 10.1007/BF03029769.