Winfield A C, Henderson-Slayden R, Wentz A C, Harding D R
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Mar;138(3):559-60. doi: 10.2214/ajr.138.3.559.
Conray 60 and Sinografin were compared as contrast agents for hysterosalpingography in 40 consecutive patients in a double-blind protocol. Emphasis was centered on the incidence and severity of symptoms during and after the procedure. Of patients receiving Conray, 36% suffered moderate or severe discomfort compared with 78% of the patients receiving Sinografin, and 13% of patients receiving Conray complained of moderate delayed discomfort compared with 28% of those receiving Sinografin. Both agents produced excellent diagnostic studies. Conray was clearly superior to Sinografin in terms of patient comfort.
在一项双盲试验中，对连续40例患者使用康瑞60（Conray 60）和泛影葡胺（Sinografin）作为子宫输卵管造影的造影剂进行了比较。重点集中在检查过程中和检查后的症状发生率和严重程度上。接受康瑞的患者中，36%出现中度或重度不适，而接受泛影葡胺的患者中这一比例为78%；接受康瑞的患者中有13%抱怨有中度延迟不适，而接受泛影葡胺的患者中这一比例为28%。两种造影剂都产生了出色的诊断效果。就患者舒适度而言，康瑞明显优于泛影葡胺。
