• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重腹部血管创伤——一种统一的处理方法。

Major abdominal vascular trauma--a unified approach.

作者信息

Kashuk J L, Moore E E, Millikan J S, Moore J B

出版信息

J Trauma. 1982 Aug;22(8):672-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198208000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-198208000-00004
PMID:6980992
Abstract

Advances in prehospital emergency care have increased the numbers of patients arriving at the hospital with immediate life-threatening trauma. This is a review of our recent 6-year experience with 161 major abdominal vascular injuries in 123 patients. The distribution by injury site and respective mortality were: 18, aortic (56%); 39, aortic branch (37%); 51, inferior vena cava (39%); 30, inferior vena cava branch (45%); and 23, portal venous system (39%). The overall death rate was 37%. Forty-six patients presented with unobtainable blood pressure and 19 (41%) survived. Left thoracotomy and temporary aortic occlusion were required in the resuscitation of 45 patients; when applied in the emergency department the salvage rate was 7%, and in the operating room, 35%. Forty-four patients had more than one major vascular injury and 17 (39% recovered, compared to a survival rate of 76% with single vascular trauma. Others have emphasized that most deaths from major abdominal vascular injury are a result of hemorrhage. In our study although 89% of mortality was due to bleeding, half occurred after control of the major bleeding sites. These findings suggest that coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis are complicating factors which demand as much attention by the surgeon as the initial resuscitation and operative control classically emphasized.

摘要

院前急救护理的进展使得送达医院的有即刻危及生命创伤的患者数量有所增加。本文回顾了我们最近6年里123例患者发生的161例严重腹部血管损伤的经验。按损伤部位及各自的死亡率分布如下:主动脉损伤18例(56%);主动脉分支损伤39例(37%);下腔静脉损伤51例(39%);下腔静脉分支损伤30例(45%);门静脉系统损伤23例(39%)。总体死亡率为37%。46例患者就诊时血压测不出,其中19例(41%)存活。45例患者在复苏过程中需要行左胸切开术及临时主动脉阻断;在急诊科应用时挽救率为7%,在手术室应用时挽救率为35%。44例患者有一处以上主要血管损伤,其中17例(39%)康复,而单一血管创伤的存活率为76%。其他人强调,大多数严重腹部血管损伤导致的死亡是出血所致。在我们的研究中,虽然89%的死亡是由于出血,但半数发生在主要出血部位得到控制之后。这些发现表明,凝血功能障碍、体温过低和酸中毒是复杂的因素,外科医生在重视传统上强调的初始复苏和手术控制的同时,也需要同样关注这些因素。

相似文献

1
Major abdominal vascular trauma--a unified approach.严重腹部血管创伤——一种统一的处理方法。
J Trauma. 1982 Aug;22(8):672-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198208000-00004.
2
Factors affecting mortality rates in patients with abdominal vascular injuries.影响腹部血管损伤患者死亡率的因素。
J Trauma. 2001 Jun;50(6):1020-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200106000-00008.
3
Inferior vena cava injuries--a continuing challenge.下腔静脉损伤——一项持续存在的挑战。
J Trauma. 1983 Mar;23(3):207-12. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198303000-00005.
4
Abdominal trauma revisited.腹部创伤再探讨。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Oct;83(10):883-8.
5
Survival trends after inferior vena cava and aortic injuries in the United States.美国下腔静脉和主动脉损伤后的生存趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1880-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Mortality and morbidity of pancreatic injury.胰腺损伤的死亡率和发病率。
Am J Surg. 1977 Nov;134(5):549-54. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90431-7.
7
Factors related to mortality in inferior vena cava injuries. A 5 year experience.下腔静脉损伤的死亡相关因素。五年经验总结。
Int Surg. 1994 Apr-Jun;79(2):138-41.
8
Factors influencing mortality and morbidity from injuries to tha abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava.
Am J Surg. 1979 Mar;137(3):384-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90074-6.
9
Emergency thoracotomy with lung resection following trauma.创伤后急诊开胸肺切除术
Am Surg. 1993 Dec;59(12):834-7.
10
Injuries of the inferior vena cava.下腔静脉损伤。
Am Surg. 1986 Jan;52(1):9-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing direct transfusion feasibility with syringe-based collection of whole blood from universal donors.评估使用注射器从通用献血者采集全血进行直接输血的可行性。
Transfusion. 2025 May;65 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-S67. doi: 10.1111/trf.18154.
2
Conventional Coagulation Tests are a better predictor of mortality than Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays in trauma patients with shock: a prospective observational study.在休克创伤患者中,传统凝血试验比粘弹性止血检测更能预测死亡率:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 12;51(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02808-8.
3
Characterization of the mesenteric circulatory physiology during hemorrhagic shock in a swine model.
猪模型中失血性休克期间肠系膜循环生理学特征
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Aug 13;10:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100119. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort.严重创伤患者中致死三联征与致死四角的比较:一项多中心队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5.
5
Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).严峻环境下危重症患者的管理:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏与重症监护学会(SIAARTI)的良好临床实践
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Nov 6;4(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00209-8.
6
Correction of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy by Goal-directed Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the ITACTIC Trial.创伤性凝血病的目标导向治疗纠正:ITACTIC 试验的二次分析。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Nov 1;141(5):904-912. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005183.
7
Changes in coagulation factor XIII activity during resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock.失血性休克复苏过程中凝血因子 XIII 活性的变化。
J Rural Med. 2024 Apr;19(2):76-82. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2023-028. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
8
Radiation-induced multi-organ injury.辐射诱导的多器官损伤。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2024;100(3):486-504. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2295298. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
9
Review of Thromboelastography (TEG): Medical and Surgical Applications.血栓弹力图(TEG)综述:医学及外科应用
Ther Adv Pulm Crit Care Med. 2023 Dec 14;18:29768675231208426. doi: 10.1177/29768675231208426. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
10
The Fibrinolytic System and Its Measurement: History, Current Uses and Future Directions for Diagnosis and Treatment.纤维蛋白溶解系统及其检测:用于诊断和治疗的历史、当前用途和未来方向。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 16;24(18):14179. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814179.