• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁来承担费用:基金会、医学专业与医学教育改革。

He who pays the piper: foundations, the medical profession, and medical education reform.

作者信息

Brown E R

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1980;10(1):71-88. doi: 10.2190/PL3K-6MY6-AAHM-586P.

DOI:10.2190/PL3K-6MY6-AAHM-586P
PMID:6986346
Abstract

The development of modern medical education was shaped by the medical profession's own reform strategies and by material and ideological support from the corporate class. This article examines how the Rockefeller medical philanthropies, the largest single source of funds for medical education reform from 1910 through the 1930s, forced the adoption of a specific reform--full-time clinical faculty--to make medicine serve the needs of capitalist society rather than the interests of the medical profession. Memorandums and letters from archival files demonstrate that foundation leaders believed the full-time plan would separate medical schools from the grip of practitioner-dominated medical societies, bringing all medical faculty under the control of foundations and university boards of trustees. This policy was to be a first step in rationalizing medical care and distributing the technical benefits and social-control functions of medicine to all segments of the population. The author traces the development of the full-time plan, its adoption as foundation policy, and the struggle over its implementation.

摘要

现代医学教育的发展受到医学专业自身改革策略以及企业阶层的物质和思想支持的影响。本文探讨了洛克菲勒医学慈善机构如何在1910年至20世纪30年代成为医学教育改革最大的单一资金来源,迫使采用一项特定改革——全职临床教员制,以使医学服务于资本主义社会的需求而非医学专业的利益。档案文件中的备忘录和信件表明,基金会领导人认为全职计划将使医学院摆脱由从业者主导的医学协会的控制,将所有医学教员置于基金会和大学董事会的控制之下。这一政策将是使医疗护理合理化并将医学的技术益处和社会控制功能分配给所有人群的第一步。作者追溯了全职计划的发展、其作为基金会政策的采纳以及围绕其实施的斗争。

相似文献

1
He who pays the piper: foundations, the medical profession, and medical education reform.谁来承担费用:基金会、医学专业与医学教育改革。
Int J Health Serv. 1980;10(1):71-88. doi: 10.2190/PL3K-6MY6-AAHM-586P.
2
The origin of the full-time faculty system. Implications for clinical research.全职教师制度的起源。对临床研究的影响。
JAMA. 1991 Mar 27;265(12):1555-62.
3
Courting the Rockefeller Foundation and other attempts to integrate clinical teaching, medical practice, and research in Melbourne.
Health History. 2009;11(2):62-91.
4
Behavioral sciences and medical education: the case of sociology.
Soc Sci Med (1967). 1973 Dec;7(12):927-41. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(73)90071-1.
5
The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform US medical education. Constant concerns.美国医学教育改革提议的相似性与频繁性。持续存在的担忧。
JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):706-11.
6
Social work and the behavioral sciences: past history, future prospects.社会工作与行为科学:过去的历史,未来的前景。
Soc Work Health Care. 2000;31(3):25-37. doi: 10.1300/J010v31n03_02.
7
Health care reform and the medical education imperative.医疗保健改革与医学教育的必要性。
JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1133-4.
8
[Science and medical education in Brazil (1930-1950)].[巴西的科学与医学教育(1930 - 1950)]
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2007 Apr-Jun;14(2):469-87. doi: 10.1590/s0104-59702007000200005.
9
The full-time clinical faculty: what goes around, comes around.全职临床教师:种瓜得瓜,种豆得豆。
Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):260-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c85b22.
10
[Reform of the medical education in the early 20th century America and the Flexner Report of 1910].[20世纪初美国的医学教育改革与1910年的《弗莱克斯纳报告》]
Uisahak. 1994;3(1):1-19.