Wren M W
J Clin Pathol. 1980 Jan;33(1):61-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.1.61.
Using fresh clinical material, a comparison of a number of anaerobic selective media was made. For Gram-negative anaerobes nalidixic acid tween agar (NAT), neomycin agar (NA), and neomycin-vancomycin agar (NVA) all performed equally well. Kanamycin-containing media were more inhibitory to all Gram-negative anaerobes other than Bacteroides fragilis and B. melaninogenicus. When the recovery of Gram-positive anaerobes was examined NAT performed better than any of the other selective media used. No single selective medium could recover all anaerobes. Better isolation was achieved using a combination of two selective media (the best combinations being NAT and NVA or NAT and NA). Only a combination of three selective media gave the maximum recovery of anaerobes in this study (NAT, NVA, and NA or KA).
利用新鲜的临床材料,对多种厌氧选择性培养基进行了比较。对于革兰氏阴性厌氧菌,萘啶酸吐温琼脂(NAT)、新霉素琼脂(NA)和新霉素-万古霉素琼脂(NVA)的表现同样良好。含卡那霉素的培养基对脆弱拟杆菌和产黑素拟杆菌以外的所有革兰氏阴性厌氧菌抑制作用更强。当检测革兰氏阳性厌氧菌的回收率时,NAT的表现优于所使用的任何其他选择性培养基。没有单一的选择性培养基能够分离出所有厌氧菌。使用两种选择性培养基的组合(最佳组合为NAT和NVA或NAT和NA)可实现更好的分离效果。在本研究中,只有三种选择性培养基的组合能使厌氧菌的回收率达到最高(NAT、NVA和NA或KA)。