Marc-Vergnes J P, Celsis P, Charlet J P, Setien G
Am J Physiol. 1980 May;238(5):H750-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1980.238.5.H750.
The accuracy of the three commonly used methods, the initial slope analysis, the stochastic analysis, and the compartmental analysis, for calculating mean cerebral blood flow from xenon-133 clearance curves was studied with the use of computer-generated and real curves. The accuracy of calculation was affected by the cutoff time of the curve, by the level of the compartmental blood flows to white and gray matter and by the ratio of these flow levels, by the relative weight of gray matter, and by the choice of the method of calculation. None of the methods was clearly superior to the others. Each had its own defects that render it more or less suitable for different situations. All three methods generally overestimated mean cerebral blood flow. This overestimation was greater the lower the flow. A curve-fitting index was devised which can be used to check the validity of the bicompartmental model when using compartmental analysis. This same index can provide, though not always, an estimate of the error in the calculation of mean cerebral blood flow when an optimization method is used.
利用计算机生成的曲线和实际曲线,研究了三种常用方法(初始斜率分析、随机分析和房室分析)从氙-133清除曲线计算平均脑血流量的准确性。计算的准确性受曲线的截止时间、白质和灰质的房室血流量水平及其流量水平之比、灰质的相对权重以及计算方法的选择影响。没有一种方法明显优于其他方法。每种方法都有其自身的缺陷,使其或多或少适用于不同情况。所有三种方法通常都高估了平均脑血流量。流量越低,这种高估就越大。设计了一个曲线拟合指数,当使用房室分析时,可用于检验双房室模型的有效性。当使用优化方法时,这个相同的指数虽然并非总是能提供,但可以对平均脑血流量计算中的误差进行估计。