Reid R T
J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Feb-Mar;20(2-3):145-50. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1980.tb02536.x.
A six-month, double-blind study was conducted to compare pirprofen (Rengasil), 800 mg per day, to aspirin, 3.6 Gm per day, in patients with active, definite, or classical rheumatoid arthritis. Data from 33 patients, 17 in the pirprofen group and 16 in the aspirin group, were analyzed for efficacy while data from 37 patients were analyzed for safety. In the pirprofen group, four of seven variables analyzed were significantly improved over baseline at the terminal visit; no statistically significant improvement was seen at the terminal visit in the aspirin group, although statistically significant improvement was achieved at a number of interim visits. Between-treatment comparisons indicated that pirprofen was statistically superior to aspirin with respect to the number of swollen joints at the terminal visit and average grip strength after six weeks of treatment. There were no serious signs of toxicity in either treatment group.
一项为期六个月的双盲研究对每日服用800毫克吡洛芬(Rengasil)的患者与每日服用3.6克阿司匹林的活动性、明确或典型类风湿性关节炎患者进行了比较。分析了来自33名患者的数据,其中吡洛芬组17名,阿司匹林组16名,以评估疗效;同时分析了来自37名患者的数据以评估安全性。在吡洛芬组中,分析的七个变量中有四个在末次访视时较基线有显著改善;阿司匹林组在末次访视时未见统计学上的显著改善,尽管在一些中期访视时取得了统计学上的显著改善。组间比较表明,在末次访视时,吡洛芬在肿胀关节数量方面以及治疗六周后的平均握力方面在统计学上优于阿司匹林。两个治疗组均未出现严重毒性迹象。