Suppr超能文献

不同清除率测定方法的比较。

Comparison of different methods of clearance determination.

作者信息

Buttermann G, Wolf I H, Heidenreich P, Oberdorfer M, Kuhlmann H, Czempiel H, Hör G, Pabst H W

出版信息

Contrib Nephrol. 1978;11:55-61. doi: 10.1159/000401777.

Abstract

Clearance determination by compartmental analysis of hippurate renograms was compared in 30 cases to the conventional PAH and to the partly shielded whole body counting technique. Good correlations between compartmental analysis and PAH method (r = 0.96) as well as the whole body technique (r = 0.94) were found. Correlation between PAH and whole body method was not always satisfactory (r = 0.85). In an additional study influence of greater count rates become obvious: correlation coefficients increase from 0.89 (131I-hippurate, n = 97) to 0.95 (123I-hippurate, n = 38). Determination of the divided clearance correlates well (r = 0.95). Using 123I-hippurate all the information available by radioisotopic kidney investigations can be obtained in a one-step procedure.

摘要

在30例患者中,将通过马尿酸盐肾图的房室分析确定清除率与传统的对氨基马尿酸(PAH)法以及部分屏蔽的全身计数技术进行了比较。发现房室分析与PAH法(r = 0.96)以及全身技术(r = 0.94)之间具有良好的相关性。PAH与全身方法之间的相关性并不总是令人满意(r = 0.85)。在另一项研究中,更高计数率的影响变得明显:相关系数从0.89(131I-马尿酸盐,n = 97)增加到0.95(123I-马尿酸盐,n = 38)。分段清除率的测定具有良好的相关性(r = 0.95)。使用123I-马尿酸盐,可以通过一步程序获得放射性同位素肾脏检查的所有可用信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验