Grimes D A, Hulka J F, McCutchen M E
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Aug 1;137(7):785-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90886-8.
To compare the safety and feasibility of midtrimester abortion by outpatient dilatation and evacuation (D-E) versus inpatient intra-amniotic instillation of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha), we performed a randomized clinical trial with 100 subjects estimated to be 13 to 18 menstrual weeks pregnant. Subjects undergoing D-E abortion had significantly better compliance with the assigned treatment (100% vs. 88%, < 0.05) and less delay prior to abortion (mean 3.7 vs. 10.1 days, p < 0.001). Subjects receiving PGF2 alpha had a relative risk of sustaining a complication 5.7 times that of subjects undergoing D-E (95% confidence interval 2.1-15.3, p < 0.001). Subjects receiving PGF 2 alpha also had significantly higher rates of vomiting and diarrhea (p < 0.01). Midtrimester abortion by outpatient D-E appears to be more acceptable to women, faster, and safer than by instillation of PGF2 alpha.
为比较孕中期门诊扩张刮宫术(D-E)与住院羊膜腔内注射前列腺素F2α(PGF2α)进行流产的安全性和可行性,我们进行了一项随机临床试验,研究对象为100名估计妊娠13至18周的孕妇。接受D-E流产的受试者对指定治疗的依从性显著更好(100%对88%,<0.05),流产前的延迟时间更短(平均3.7天对10.1天,p<0.001)。接受PGF2α治疗的受试者发生并发症的相对风险是接受D-E治疗受试者的5.7倍(95%置信区间2.1-15.3,p<0.001)。接受PGF2α治疗的受试者呕吐和腹泻发生率也显著更高(p<0.01)。孕中期门诊D-E流产似乎比注射PGF2α更易被女性接受,速度更快且更安全。