Kluyskens Y, Snoeck J
Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(9):638-43. doi: 10.1185/03007998009109502.
The antihypertensive and clinical effects of two centrally acting drugs, guanabenz and clonidine, were compared in a double-blind trial in 29 patients with established hypertension. After a 1-week baseline period and 2 weeks on placebo, patients received treatment with either guanabenz (mean dose 24 mg daily) or clonidine (mean dose 0.45 mg daily) alone for 8 weeks. Both drugs produced equivalent and highly significant (p < 0.001) reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the standing and supine positions. They also reduced significantly the standing and supine pulse rates. Normal orthostatic responses were maintained with both regimens. All but 1 patient in each group reported side-effects during active treatment, the most frequent being dry mouth and sedation with each drug. No laboratory or ECG abnormalities related to treatment were observed.
在一项针对29例确诊高血压患者的双盲试验中,比较了两种中枢性作用药物胍那苄和可乐定的降压效果及临床疗效。在为期1周的基线期和2周的安慰剂治疗期后,患者单独接受胍那苄(平均每日剂量24毫克)或可乐定(平均每日剂量0.45毫克)治疗8周。两种药物均使站立位和仰卧位的收缩压和舒张压显著降低(p<0.001),且效果相当。它们还显著降低了站立位和仰卧位的脉搏率。两种治疗方案均维持了正常的直立位反应。每组除1例患者外,所有患者在积极治疗期间均报告有副作用,每种药物最常见的副作用是口干和镇静。未观察到与治疗相关的实验室或心电图异常。