Cross F S, Long M W, Banner A S, Snider D E
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Aug;122(2):349-53. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.122.2.349.
A history of alcoholism is often regarded as a relative contraindication to the use of isoniazid and rifampin in patients with tuberculosis. To test the validity of this assumption the outcome of 6 months of rifampin-isoniazid therapy was analyzed for the first 531 eligible patients enrolled in a U.S. Public Health Service Cooperative Trial of Short-Course Chemotherapy of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. In this study, data were available to classify a patient as an alcoholic in the following 2 ways: (1) patient's statement that he was a moderate, heavy, or excessive user of alcohol, or (2) patient's score of 6 or more on a Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). Based on their statements, 58% of the patients were classified as alcoholic, whereas only 17.9% were thus classified by their MAST scores. Although alcoholics had more abnormal concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) before and during therapy, there was no significant difference between the alcoholics and non-alcoholics in the incidence of adverse reactions, including hepatotoxic reactions, including hepatotoxic reactions, attributed to the drugs. We concluded that in the absence of clinically significant and persistent pretreatment abnormalities of hepatic function tests, rifampin and isoniazid are not contraindicated in patients categorized as alcoholic by our 2 commonly used methods.
酗酒史通常被视为肺结核患者使用异烟肼和利福平的相对禁忌证。为了检验这一假设的正确性,我们分析了美国公共卫生服务局肺结核短程化疗合作试验中首批入组的531例符合条件患者接受6个月利福平-异烟肼治疗的结果。在本研究中,可通过以下两种方式将患者归类为酗酒者:(1)患者自述为中度、重度或过度饮酒者;(2)患者在密歇根酒精ism筛查测试简表(MAST)中得分6分或更高。根据患者自述,58%的患者被归类为酗酒者,而根据MAST评分,只有17.9%的患者被如此归类。尽管酗酒者在治疗前及治疗期间天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)浓度有更多异常,但在归因于这些药物的不良反应(包括肝毒性反应)发生率方面,酗酒者与非酗酒者之间并无显著差异。我们得出结论,在肝功能检查无临床显著且持续的治疗前异常的情况下,对于通过我们常用的两种方法归类为酗酒者的患者,利福平和异烟肼并非禁忌。