Wetzels E, Raschig A, Kaiser H J
Med Klin. 1980 Sep 12;75(19):688-92.
In a multicenter study with 54 patients with essential and renal hypertension (WHO I to III) the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of guanfacine were evaluated against clonidine in a double blind cross-over design. The treatment period for each drug lasted five weeks. There was a two week's wash-out period with placebo between the application of the respective preparations. During the first two weeks of treatment a daily dose of 3.3 mg guanfacine and 0.5 mg clonidine led to a significant fall in blood pressure from 187/103/138 mm Hg (s/d/m) to 152/86/113 mm Hg and from 186/101/136 mm Hg to 156/91/118 mm Hg respectively. During the following time blood pressure and dosage remained almost unchanged. In contrast to clonidine the guanfacine group showed a smaller fall in blood pressure in upright than in supine position. Both drugs showed a decrease of heart rate by approximately 4 beats per minute. Side effects such as dry mouth and tiredness were more pronounced under treatment with clonidine than with guanfacine (p less than or equal to 0,08). Guanfacine is well tolerated as a potential antihypertensive drug with relatively few side effects of mild nature.
在一项针对54例原发性和肾性高血压患者(WHO I至III级)的多中心研究中,采用双盲交叉设计,对比可乐定评估了胍法辛的降压疗效和安全性。每种药物的治疗期持续5周。在使用各自制剂之间,有两周的安慰剂洗脱期。在治疗的前两周,每日剂量3.3毫克胍法辛和0.5毫克可乐定分别使血压从187/103/138毫米汞柱(收缩压/舒张压/平均动脉压)显著降至152/86/113毫米汞柱,以及从186/101/136毫米汞柱降至156/91/118毫米汞柱。在接下来的时间里,血压和剂量几乎保持不变。与可乐定不同,胍法辛组直立位血压下降幅度小于仰卧位。两种药物均使心率降低约每分钟4次。口干和疲劳等副作用在可乐定治疗时比胍法辛更明显(p小于或等于0.08)。胍法辛作为一种潜在的降压药物耐受性良好,副作用相对较少且性质较轻。