Loewenthal L M
J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1978 Jul;4(3):104-6. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(78)80117-7.
One-hundred patients having intracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation are compared with 139 patients having routine intracapsular cataract extraction. All patients were operated on by one surgeon, utilizing one technique, and, where implantation was performed, utilizing one style of lens from one manufacturer. Follow-up period was 6 to 28 months. Seventy-four percent of the implant patients achieved VA greater than or equal to 20/40, compared to 84.2% of the routine cataract patients. Of patients receiving Supramid/Prolene-supported lenses, 84.7% had VA greater than or equal to 20/40. Those patients with titanium-supported loops have a much higher incidence of CME resulting in decreased VA, indicating that this type of lens should not be used. Dislocation of intraocular lenses was the same, whether or not the loops were sutured.
对100例行囊内白内障摘除联合人工晶状体植入术的患者与139例行常规囊内白内障摘除术的患者进行了比较。所有患者均由一名外科医生采用一种技术进行手术,在进行植入时,使用的是来自同一制造商的一种款式的人工晶状体。随访期为6至28个月。植入人工晶状体的患者中有74%的视力达到或优于20/40,而常规白内障患者的这一比例为84.2%。接受Supramid/聚丙烯支撑人工晶状体的患者中,84.7%的视力达到或优于20/40。那些使用钛支撑袢的患者发生黄斑囊样水肿导致视力下降的发生率要高得多,这表明不应使用这种类型的人工晶状体。无论袢是否缝合,人工晶状体脱位的情况相同。