Bigongiari L R, Preston D F, Cook L, Dwyer S J, Fritz S, Fryback D G, Thornbury J R
Invest Radiol. 1981 Jan-Feb;16(1):77-81. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198101000-00014.
A new decision model for differentiating renal masses by urographic criteria has been developed and tested to demonstrate the use of uncertainty/information as a measure. The conditional probabilities used in this model are the relative frequency of occurrence of 15 specific uroradiographic signs in the presence of cyst, tumor, and benign cortical nodule. The decision model was applied to data obtained at the time of initial interpretation of 80 cases of renal mass discovered on urography. The probability of diagnosis was calculated by computer and compared to the radiologist's subjective probability estimate made prospectively at the time of initial interpretation. Information theory was applied to optimize the sequence in which signs were evaluated. The signs likely to maximally reduce the uncertainty of a diagnosis were evaluated first. The utility of this model and the comparative significance of various urographic signs used diagnose renal cysts, tumors, and benign cortical nodules were assessed. This model of renal mass evaluation at urography demonstrates principles of information theory that can be applied to more difficult and complex diagnostic and management problems.
一种通过尿路造影标准鉴别肾肿块的新决策模型已被开发并测试,以证明将不确定性/信息用作一种度量方法的用途。该模型中使用的条件概率是在存在囊肿、肿瘤和良性皮质结节的情况下15种特定尿路造影征象出现的相对频率。该决策模型应用于在尿路造影时初步解读80例肾肿块时获得的数据。诊断概率由计算机计算得出,并与放射科医生在初步解读时前瞻性做出的主观概率估计进行比较。应用信息论来优化评估征象的顺序。首先评估那些可能最大程度降低诊断不确定性的征象。评估了该模型的效用以及用于诊断肾囊肿、肿瘤和良性皮质结节的各种尿路造影征象的比较意义。这种尿路造影时肾肿块评估模型展示了信息论原理,这些原理可应用于更困难和复杂的诊断及管理问题。