Suppr超能文献

对累及无名骨的原发性肿瘤进行切除及重建。

Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone.

作者信息

Enneking W F, Dunham W K

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Sep;60(6):731-46.

PMID:701308
Abstract

Using described criteria for the selection of patients for excision or resection of tumors involving various portions of the innominate bone, as opposed to hemipelvectomy, fifty-seven out of the more than 200 patients evaluated were judged to be candidates for a curative procedure. Of these, twenty-five were selected for hemipelvectomy and thirty-two, for non-amputative procedures. Depending on the location and extent of the lesion as determined by complete preoperative work-ups, three types of procedures were performed singly or in combination:(1) wide excision or radical resection of the iliac wing; (2) periacetabular wide excision or radical resection; or (3) wide excision or radical resection of the pubis. Reconstruction was accomplished when the hip joint was excised by fusion or the creation of a pseudarthrosis either medially in relation to the pubis or laterally in relation to the ilium or wing of the sacrum. The results after follow-ups of one to seventeen years were assessed in terms of the immediate goals of surgery, control of the disease, and function. The findings were as follows: With the preoperative assessment and operative techniques described, an oncologically adequate procedure was performed in two-thirds of the cases. In the remaining cases, the adequacy of the procedure was compromised by poorly planned biopsies, occult microextensions, and surgical errors. The recurrence rate was high after the inadequate procedure (100 per cent) and low (4 per cent) after the adequately accomplished procedures. Function was nearly normal when the hip joint was preserved. If the hip joint was removed and fusion was obtained, the results were good, but fusion was obtained in only 50 percent of the cases in which it was attempted. If the hip joint was removed and pseudarthrosis resulted, the results ranged from good to poor. Sciatic-nerve involvement necessitating resection of the nerve was not a contraindication to a non-amputative procedure.

摘要

采用所描述的标准来选择适合切除或切除累及无名骨各部位肿瘤(而非半骨盆切除术)的患者,在接受评估的200多名患者中,有57名被判定为适合进行根治性手术。其中,25名患者选择了半骨盆切除术,32名患者选择了非截肢手术。根据术前全面检查确定的病变位置和范围,单独或联合进行了三种类型的手术:(1)髂骨翼广泛切除或根治性切除;(2)髋臼周围广泛切除或根治性切除;或(3)耻骨广泛切除或根治性切除。当髋关节被切除时,通过融合或在内侧相对于耻骨、外侧相对于髂骨或骶骨翼创建假关节来完成重建。根据手术的近期目标、疾病控制和功能对1至17年的随访结果进行了评估。结果如下:采用所描述的术前评估和手术技术,三分之二的病例进行了肿瘤学上充分的手术。在其余病例中,手术的充分性因活检计划不当、隐匿性微小扩展和手术失误而受到影响。手术不充分时复发率高(100%),而手术充分完成时复发率低(4%)。保留髋关节时功能接近正常。如果髋关节被切除并获得融合,结果良好,但在尝试融合的病例中只有50%获得了融合。如果髋关节被切除并形成假关节,结果从良好到较差不等。坐骨神经受累需要切除神经并非非截肢手术的禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验