Greca F, Nevah E, Hares M, Keighley M R
J R Soc Med. 1981 May;74(5):368-70. doi: 10.1177/014107688107400509.
A prospective randomized trial compared anal stretch with or without continued dilatation for three months in 89 consecutive patients with haemorrhoids. Complications of therapy occurred in only 4 patients, 3 of whom had transient incontinence of flatus. When patients were reviewed four months after treatment, only 4 of 44 patients (9%) who used a dilator had not been improved and required additional therapy, compared with 15 of 42 patients (36%) who had anal stretch alone (P less than 0.02). It is concluded that the use of an anal dilator improves the results of anal stretch.
一项前瞻性随机试验对89例连续性痔疮患者进行了比较,这些患者被随机分为两组,一组接受肛门扩张术且持续扩张三个月,另一组仅接受肛门扩张术。治疗并发症仅发生在4例患者中,其中3例有短暂的排气失禁。在治疗四个月后对患者进行复查时,使用扩张器的44例患者中只有4例(9%)未得到改善且需要额外治疗,而仅接受肛门扩张术的42例患者中有15例(36%)未得到改善(P<0.02)。结论是使用肛门扩张器可改善肛门扩张术的效果。