Peck C C, Pond S M, Becker C E, Lee K
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1981 Spring;5(2):252-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1981.tb04897.x.
Analysis of self-reported alcohol intake by alcoholic subjects participating in a two-period crossover trial of lithium versus placebo failed to demonstrate a significant effect of lithium in reducing alcohol consumption. An appraisal of the adequacy of this study design to meet the original objective of the trial was undertaken. It was impossible under this study design to simultaneously and unequivocally estimate effects of treatment periods, drug carryover, sequence group and other period by treatment interactions in addiction to the lithium/placebo effects. Presence of one or more of these additional influences on the trial outcome not only complicated the interpretation of results but diminished the power of the trial design to test the major hypothesis of interest, that lithium could reduce alcohol intake. We conclude that the two-period crossover design has serious drawbacks in this clinical trial setting and that alternative strategies need to be considered for future trials.
对参与锂盐与安慰剂两阶段交叉试验的酒精依赖受试者的自我报告酒精摄入量进行分析,结果未能证明锂盐在减少酒精消耗方面有显著效果。对该研究设计能否达成试验最初目标的充分性进行了评估。在这种研究设计下,除了锂盐/安慰剂效应外,不可能同时明确估计治疗阶段、药物残留、序列组以及其他治疗与阶段交互作用的影响。这些对试验结果的额外影响中的一种或多种的存在,不仅使结果的解释变得复杂,还削弱了试验设计检验主要研究假设(即锂盐可减少酒精摄入量)的效能。我们得出结论,在这种临床试验环境中,两阶段交叉设计存在严重缺陷,未来试验需要考虑其他替代策略。