• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上密苏里河千年以来的颅面异常:考古学与临床证据

Craniofacial anomalies in the Upper Missouri River over a millennium: archeological and clinical evidence.

作者信息

Gregg J B, Zimmerman L, Clifford S, Gregg P S

出版信息

Cleft Palate J. 1981 Jul;18(3):210-22.

PMID:7018741
Abstract

Congenital facial clefting occurs more often in Native Americans from the Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) than it does in the general population. However, no facial clefts were seen in 3,750 ancient UMRB skeletons. Very few reports concerning defective palate crania are in the literature of paleopathology. Findings regarding craniofacial anomalies in today's native Americans in the UMRB are presented briefly and compared to those in skeletons from this region. There is a marked difference between the frequency of anomalies which occurred in the past and those which are present today. Although the people sampled here were from many cultures and lived during different time periods, encompassing over a millenium, the fundamental denominator was a common geographic location. Reasons for the differences between the past and the present are advanced. It may be possible to estimate the frequency of anomalies which have not been found in archeological specimens but which are present today. By comparing data concerning "occult" congenital anomalies of the past with those of the present, the actual prevalence of past cranio-facial anomalies may be estimated through careful extrapolation.

摘要

先天性面部裂在密苏里河上游流域(UMRB)的美洲原住民中比在普通人群中更为常见。然而,在3750具UMRB古代骨骼中未发现面部裂。古病理学文献中关于腭裂颅骨的报道非常少。简要介绍了当今UMRB地区美洲原住民颅面异常的研究结果,并与该地区骨骼中的结果进行了比较。过去出现的异常频率与当今出现的异常频率之间存在显著差异。尽管这里抽样的人群来自多种文化,生活在不同时期,跨越了一千多年,但基本共同点是地理位置相同。文中提出了过去与现在存在差异的原因。有可能估计在考古标本中未发现但在当今存在的异常频率。通过将过去“隐匿”先天性异常的数据与现在的数据进行比较,可以通过仔细推断来估计过去颅面异常的实际患病率。

相似文献

1
Craniofacial anomalies in the Upper Missouri River over a millennium: archeological and clinical evidence.上密苏里河千年以来的颅面异常:考古学与临床证据
Cleft Palate J. 1981 Jul;18(3):210-22.
2
Craniofacial anomalies in South Dakota: 1960 through 1984.南达科他州的颅面异常情况:1960年至1984年。
S D J Med. 1987 Sep;40(9):7-12.
3
Congenital anomalies in American Indians of British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省美洲印第安人的先天性异常。
Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3(6):455-67. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370030609.
4
Treatment of patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate--a short outline of history and current interdisciplinary treatment approaches.唇腭裂患者的治疗——历史简述与当前跨学科治疗方法
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;34 Suppl 2:17-21. doi: 10.1016/S1010-5182(06)60005-X.
5
The epidemiology of orofacial clefts. 2. Associated malformations.口面部裂隙的流行病学。2. 相关畸形。
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):242-8.
6
Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. March, 1993.唇腭裂或其他颅面畸形患者的评估与治疗参数。美国腭裂-颅面协会。1993年3月。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Mar;30 Suppl:S1-16.
7
Embryology and epidemiology of cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂的胚胎学与流行病学
B-ENT. 2006;2 Suppl 4:11-9.
8
A proposed new classification of craniofacial anomalies.一种关于颅面畸形的新分类建议。
Cleft Palate J. 1981 Jul;18(3):161-76.
9
The epidemiology of orofacial clefts. 1. Some general epidemiological characteristics.口腔颌面裂隙的流行病学。1. 一些一般流行病学特征。
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):234-41.
10
Evidence of probable scurvy in subadults from archeological sites in North America.来自北美考古遗址的亚成年人中可能存在坏血病的证据。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Apr;114(4):343-51. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1046.