Suppr超能文献

林克尔注射疗法:一项多中心对照研究。

Rinkel injection therapy: a multicenter controlled study.

作者信息

Hirsch S R, Kalbfleisch J H, Golbert T M, Josephson B M, McConnell L H, Scanlon R, Kniker W T, Fink J N, Murphree J J, Cohen S H

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Aug;68(2):133-55. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90172-x.

Abstract

The American Academy of Allergy sponsored a 2-yr "double blind" multicenter study of the effect of Rinkel injection therapy (RIT) compared with a histamine placebo in subjects with atopic rhinitis. Accumulated data included the symptom, medication, and physical examination scores and specific IgE antibody levels measured by the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). A total of 155 subjects (81 treated, 74 placebo) entered the project from six centers during their respective ragweed, grass, and mountain cedar pollen (from one center) seasons for a total of 11 pollen seasons. The total mean cumulative dose of extract was 18.6 PNU, which is much lower than recommended for standard immunotherapy. With one exception, none of the centers reported a consistent significant difference between the pollen extract-treated and placebo-treated groups in any of the weekly mean scores or the RAST before, during, and after the pollen seasons. For 4 wk after the height of the mountain cedar season the group treated with pollen extract showed a significant decrease in weekly mean symptom and medication scores as compared with the placebo group. The overall comparison of the mean seasonal scores for the entire study, however, showed no significant difference between the treated and placebo groups. We conclude the RIT is no more effective than a histamine placebo in influencing the weekly mean symptom, medication, and physical examination scores or IgE antibody levels.

摘要

美国过敏学会发起了一项为期两年的“双盲”多中心研究,比较了林克尔注射疗法(RIT)与组胺安慰剂对特应性鼻炎患者的疗效。积累的数据包括症状、用药情况、体格检查评分以及通过放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)测定的特异性IgE抗体水平。在六个中心,共有155名受试者(81名接受治疗,74名接受安慰剂治疗)在各自的豚草、草和山地雪松花粉(其中一个中心)季节进入该项目,共计11个花粉季节。提取物的总平均累积剂量为18.6 PNU,远低于标准免疫疗法的推荐剂量。除一个中心外,没有任何一个中心报告在花粉季节之前、期间和之后,花粉提取物治疗组和安慰剂治疗组在任何每周平均评分或RAST方面存在一致的显著差异。在山地雪松季节高峰期过后的4周内,与安慰剂组相比,花粉提取物治疗组的每周平均症状和用药评分显著降低。然而,整个研究的平均季节评分的总体比较显示,治疗组和安慰剂组之间没有显著差异。我们得出结论,在影响每周平均症状、用药情况、体格检查评分或IgE抗体水平方面,RIT并不比组胺安慰剂更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验