Barton M, Oleske J, LaBraico J
J Natl Med Assoc. 1983 Aug;75(8):831-4.
The treatment of allergies is based more on sound scientific principles today than it was 20 years ago; however, allergy control still suffers from controversial diagnostic and treatment methods. Controlled studies have failed to support the skin titration (Rinkel method) used to establish an optimal dose for the relief of hay fever symptoms. Determining the clinical usefulness of cytotoxic testing is fraught with lack of clinical correlations and a high percentage of false positives. The results of double-blind studies demonstrated that cytotoxic testing is not a reliable diagnostic technique. Similarly, controlled studies do not corroborate the clinical usefulness proponents advocate for sublingual and provocative subcutaneous testing for diagnosing and treating allergy. The use of autogenous-urine immunization has no proven efficacy and can predispose the patient to potential harmful effects. These diagnostic modalities have not proved to be helpful and should not be employed in the assessment of the allergic patient.
如今,过敏症的治疗比20年前更基于可靠的科学原理;然而,过敏控制仍存在有争议的诊断和治疗方法。对照研究未能支持用于确定缓解花粉热症状最佳剂量的皮肤滴定法(林克尔法)。确定细胞毒性检测的临床实用性充满了缺乏临床相关性以及高比例假阳性的问题。双盲研究结果表明,细胞毒性检测不是一种可靠的诊断技术。同样,对照研究也没有证实支持者所主张的舌下和激发性皮下检测在诊断和治疗过敏方面的临床实用性。自体尿液免疫疗法没有已证实的疗效,并且可能使患者易受潜在有害影响。这些诊断方式尚未证明是有帮助的,不应用于评估过敏患者。