Helmerhorst F M, Bossers B, de Bruin H G, Engelfriet C P, von dem Borne A E
Vox Sang. 1980 Aug;39(2):83-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1980.tb01842.x.
For the detection of auto-antibodies on the platelets and in the serum of patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, three new techniques have recently been developed: the quantitative antiglobulin consumption assay (QACA), the platelet radioactive antiglobulin test (PRAT) and the platelet suspension immunofluorescence test (PSIFT). The results obtained by various investigators with these techniques differ considerably. We, therefore, studied the sensitivity of the three methods. This was done by testing platelet-reactive allo-antibodies (anti-Zwa, anti-HLA-A2) and auto-antibodies in titration. The results show that the PSIFT is the most sensitive technique, closely followed by the PRAT. The QACA was found to be much less sensitive than the other two methods. This suggests that a positive result in the QACA and a negative result in the PSIFT and/or PRAT cannot be attributed to the presence of platelet auto-antibodies.
为检测特发性血小板减少性紫癜患者血小板及血清中的自身抗体,最近开发了三种新技术:定量抗球蛋白消耗试验(QACA)、血小板放射性抗球蛋白试验(PRAT)和血小板悬液免疫荧光试验(PSIFT)。不同研究者使用这些技术获得的结果差异很大。因此,我们研究了这三种方法的敏感性。通过滴定检测血小板反应性同种抗体(抗-Zwa、抗-HLA-A2)和自身抗体来完成此项研究。结果表明,PSIFT是最敏感的技术,PRAT紧随其后。发现QACA的敏感性远低于其他两种方法。这表明QACA呈阳性结果而PSIFT和/或PRAT呈阴性结果不能归因于血小板自身抗体的存在。