Doran J, Hardcastle J D
Br J Surg. 1981 Oct;68(10):731-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681018.
Twenty patients entered a prospective controlled trial of colostomy management by three techniques--natural evacuation, colostomy irrigation and foam enema. Every patient spent 2 months using each technique. The mean number of colostomy actions weekly was 17 during natural evacuation, 6 during irrigation and 10 with the enema. There was no significant difference in the time taken to manage the colostomy by each technique. Eighteen patients considered that both irrigation and the foam enema improved the quality of their life, and opted to continue with irrigation on completion of the study. There were no major complications during the trial but leakage of foam and an increase in flatus were problems with the foam enema. It is concluded that patients should be made aware of the alternative methods available for colostomy management and be encouraged to use the method of their choice.
20名患者参与了一项前瞻性对照试验,该试验采用三种技术管理结肠造口术,即自然排便、结肠造口灌洗和泡沫灌肠。每位患者使用每种技术2个月。自然排便时,每周结肠造口排便的平均次数为17次;灌洗时为6次;灌肠时为10次。每种技术管理结肠造口所花费的时间没有显著差异。18名患者认为灌洗和泡沫灌肠都改善了他们的生活质量,并选择在研究结束后继续进行灌洗。试验期间没有出现重大并发症,但泡沫灌肠存在泡沫泄漏和肠胀气增加的问题。得出的结论是,应该让患者了解结肠造口管理的其他可用方法,并鼓励他们使用自己选择的方法。