Lad T E, Nelson R B, Diekamp U, Kukla L J, Sarma P R, Larson C S, Currie E T, Chawla M S, Tichler T, Zawila P, McGuire W P
Cancer Treat Rep. 1981 Nov-Dec;65(11-12):973-8.
A randomized control trial was performed in good performance status patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer to test a strategy of early aggressive combination chemotherapy (CAMP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine]) versus a strategy of delaying such treatment until clinical deterioration. Thirty-seven patients received immediate CAMP and 35 patients received initial low-dose single-agent CCNU (CAMP was postponed). Immediate CAMP therapy produced an objective response rate of 44% in patients with measurable lesions, and CCNU produced none. Median survival was 193 days for the immediate-CAMP group and 175 days for the postponed-CAMP group (P = 0.26). Measures of quality of life were made and no difference emerged between the two treatment strategies. This trial failed to show substantial benefit from immediate combination chemotherapy in minimally symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
对身体状况良好的不可切除非小细胞肺癌患者进行了一项随机对照试验,以测试早期积极联合化疗策略(CAMP[环磷酰胺、阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤和丙卡巴肼])与延迟治疗直至临床病情恶化策略的效果。37例患者接受即刻CAMP治疗,35例患者接受初始低剂量单药洛莫司汀治疗(CAMP推迟)。即刻CAMP治疗使可测量病灶患者的客观缓解率达到44%,而洛莫司汀未产生缓解。即刻CAMP组的中位生存期为193天,推迟CAMP组为175天(P = 0.26)。进行了生活质量评估,两种治疗策略之间未出现差异。该试验未能显示即刻联合化疗对症状轻微的非小细胞肺癌患者有显著益处。