• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综述:臭氧水处理对健康的影响

Minireview: the health implications of water treatment with ozone.

作者信息

Carmichael N G, Winder C, Borges S H, Backhouse B L, Lewis P D

出版信息

Life Sci. 1982 Jan 11;30(2):117-29. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90643-9.

DOI:10.1016/0024-3205(82)90643-9
PMID:7033710
Abstract

Ozone is a highly efficient disinfectant which may have significant advantages in water treatment compared to chlorine. It has, however, been shown that mutagenic and possibly carcinogenic byproducts may be produced under certain conditions of ozonation. Light chlorination following ozonization may meet the highest standards of disinfection. In addition the destruction of much of the organic matter by prior ozone treatment may well result in less harmful chlorinated and brominated products in the finished water. In many cases ozone treatment alone may suffice. It would be desirable to test with long term in vivo experiments which of the alternatives produces the best combination of microbiologically clean and pleasant water with minimum mutagenic and carcinogenic effect.

摘要

臭氧是一种高效消毒剂,与氯相比,在水处理方面可能具有显著优势。然而,已有研究表明,在特定的臭氧化条件下可能会产生诱变及潜在致癌的副产物。臭氧化后进行轻度氯化处理可达到最高消毒标准。此外,预先进行臭氧处理破坏了大部分有机物,很可能会使成品水中产生危害较小的氯化和溴化产物。在许多情况下,仅进行臭氧处理可能就足够了。进行长期的体内实验来测试哪种替代方案能产生微生物纯净且口感良好的水,同时将诱变和致癌作用降至最低,这将是很有必要的。

相似文献

1
Minireview: the health implications of water treatment with ozone.综述:臭氧水处理对健康的影响
Life Sci. 1982 Jan 11;30(2):117-29. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90643-9.
2
Mutagenic activity of disinfection by-products.消毒副产物的诱变活性。
Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Nov;69:165-75. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8669165.
3
Mutagenic activity associated with by-products of drinking water disinfection by chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ozone and UV-irradiation.与氯、二氧化氯、臭氧和紫外线辐射等饮用水消毒副产物相关的诱变活性。
Environ Health Perspect. 1982 Dec;46:197-205. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8246197.
4
[Comparative studies on the action of chlorine and ozone on polioviruses in the reprocessing of drinking water in Essen (author's transl)].[埃森饮用水再处理过程中氯和臭氧对脊髓灰质炎病毒作用的比较研究(作者译)]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Jul;160(4-5):305-41.
5
Role of ozone and granular activated carbon in the removal of mutagenic compounds.臭氧和颗粒活性炭在去除致突变化合物中的作用。
Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Nov;69:159-63. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8669159.
6
Use of biological assay systems to assess the relative carcinogenic hazards of disinfection by-products.使用生物测定系统评估消毒副产物的相对致癌风险。
Environ Health Perspect. 1982 Dec;46:215-27. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8246215.
7
[Impact of chlorination and ozonization on the total mutagenic activity of drinking water].[氯化和臭氧化对饮用水总致突变活性的影响]
Gig Sanit. 1997 Jan-Feb(1):11-3.
8
Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research.饮用水中受管制和新出现的消毒副产物的发生、遗传毒性和致癌性:综述与研究路线图
Mutat Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;636(1-3):178-242. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
9
The safety of water disinfection.水消毒的安全性。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1982;3:393-418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.03.050182.002141.
10
Advantages and disadvantages of chemical oxidation and disinfection by ozone and chlorine dioxide.臭氧和二氧化氯进行化学氧化与消毒的优缺点。
Sci Total Environ. 1981 Apr;18:245-61. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(81)80062-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of online monitoring of drinking water quality for the city of Prague and the surrounding areas.改善布拉格市及周边地区饮用水水质的在线监测。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Oct 30;193(11):758. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09534-9.
2
Dose-related changes of oxidative stress and cell proliferation in kidneys of male and female F344 rats exposed to potassium bromate.暴露于溴酸钾的雄性和雌性F344大鼠肾脏中氧化应激和细胞增殖的剂量相关变化。
Cancer Sci. 2004 May;95(5):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03221.x.