Suppr超能文献

臭氧和二氧化氯进行化学氧化与消毒的优缺点。

Advantages and disadvantages of chemical oxidation and disinfection by ozone and chlorine dioxide.

作者信息

Fiessinger F, Richard Y, Montiel A, Musquere P

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 1981 Apr;18:245-61. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(81)80062-9.

Abstract

Ozone and chlorine dioxide present definite advantages and disadvantages over chlorination. Chlorination, particularly for the removal of ammonia and the maintenance of a disinfectant residual in the distribution system has decisive advantages and will be difficult to replace. Ozone and chlorine dioxide seem to produce fewer carcinogenic by-products but the risk for acute toxicity, especially from the chlorites which follow chlorine dioxide, is higher than with chlorine. Chlorine dioxide and more particularly ozone should be considered as useful complements to chlorination, but no strong oxidative treatment should be applied before most of the organic matter has been removed.

摘要

与氯化消毒相比,臭氧和二氧化氯既有明确的优点,也有缺点。氯化消毒,特别是在去除氨以及在配水系统中维持消毒剂余量方面具有决定性优势,且难以被替代。臭氧和二氧化氯似乎产生的致癌副产物较少,但急性毒性风险,尤其是二氧化氯之后产生的亚氯酸盐带来的风险,比氯更高。二氧化氯,尤其是臭氧,应被视为氯化消毒的有益补充,但在大部分有机物被去除之前,不应进行强氧化处理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验