Nemeth A, Roseano M
Chir Ital. 1981 Aug;33(4):823-36.
After expressing some considerations on "conservative operations" and "limited resections" for cancer of the breast, the Authors describe the technique of performance of modified Patey's radical mastectomy. This operations is less destructive than Halsted's but nevertheless gives a sufficient guarantee of radicality, as confirmed by an examination of the most recent literature. The procedure also allows better aesthetic results to be achieved with subsequent plastic surgery. From the data reported in literature on comparison between the five-year results after radical mastectomy according to Halsted and modified radical mastectomy according to Patey, it can be seen that the survival rate is roughly the same. The local relapse rates both in the cases with lymph node involvement are likewise similar, irrespective of technique. This evidences that Patey's operation is correctly indicated in carcinomas of the breast not yet locally advanced.
在对乳腺癌的“保守手术”和“有限切除”表达了一些看法之后,作者们描述了改良帕蒂根治性乳房切除术的操作技术。该手术比霍尔斯特德手术的破坏性小,但从最新文献研究来看,仍能充分保证根治性。该手术方法也能通过后续整形手术获得更好的美学效果。从文献报道的关于霍尔斯特德根治性乳房切除术与帕蒂改良根治性乳房切除术五年结果对比的数据可以看出,生存率大致相同。无论采用何种技术,有淋巴结受累病例的局部复发率同样相似。这表明帕蒂手术对于尚未局部进展的乳腺癌是正确的选择。