Suppr超能文献

布比卡因与丙胺卡因用于静脉局部麻醉的比较——一项双盲试验

Comparison of bupivacaine and prilocaine used in Bier block--a double blind trial.

作者信息

Hollingworth A, Wallace W A, Dabir R, Ellis S J, Smith A F

出版信息

Injury. 1982 Jan;13(4):331-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(82)90331-x.

Abstract

The value of Bier blocks for the manipulation of fractures and for operations on the upper limb is well recognized. Two anaesthetic agents, bupivacaine and prilocaine, are widely used for this purpose. A prospective double blind trial of 200 patients has been carried out to compare the efficacy of each drug and the incidence of side effects. The study shows that bupivacaine was associated with a greater number of successful fracture reductions than prilocaine with little difference in their analgesic effects, but this was balanced by more minor side effects with bupivacaine. There was little difference in the time from injection to analgesia in the two groups. All intravenous regional analgesia procedures were carried out by junior orthopaedic or accident and emergency doctors. The overall success rate for analgesia was 91 per cent but marked cuff discomfort occurred in 9 per cent of patients. There was a clear association between failure of analgesia and two of the doctors carrying out the procedure.

摘要

上肢骨折整复及手术时静脉局部麻醉(Bier阻滞)的价值已得到广泛认可。两种麻醉药,布比卡因和丙胺卡因,被广泛用于此目的。对200例患者进行了一项前瞻性双盲试验,以比较每种药物的疗效和副作用发生率。研究表明,与丙胺卡因相比,布比卡因用于骨折复位成功的次数更多,两者镇痛效果差异不大,但布比卡因的轻微副作用更多,两相抵消。两组从注射到产生镇痛效果的时间差异不大。所有静脉局部镇痛操作均由初级骨科医生或急诊医生进行。镇痛的总体成功率为91%,但9%的患者出现明显的袖带不适。镇痛失败与两位实施该操作的医生之间存在明显关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验