Suppr超能文献

持续性静脉输注血管加压素治疗活动性上消化道出血

Continuous intravenous vasopressin in active upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Fogel M R, Knauer C M, Andres L L, Mahal A S, Stein D E, Kemeny M J, Rinki M M, Walker J E, Siegmund D, Gregory P B

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1982 May;96(5):565-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-5-565.

Abstract

Sixty patients with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomized to received either continuous intravenous infusions of vasopressin (29 patients) or placebo (31 patients) at a rate of 40 U/h. Six hours after beginning the study, 13 patients in the vasopressin group and 11 in the placebo group] had ceased bleeding (p = 0.46). By 24 hours. 17 patients in the vasopressin group and 14 in the placebo group had stopped bleeding (p = 0.30). Restriction of the analysis to patients bleeding from varices showed no advantage with vasopressin treatment after 6 or 24 hours. No consistent trend favoring use of vasopressin to stop hemorrhage was noted during the 30-month study period. There was little difference between the two groups in the number of patients needing surgery (13 on vasopressin, 18 on placebo; p = 0.30) or the number of deaths (eight on vasopressin, 11 on placebo; p = 0.51); the transfusion requirement was the same. In our patients, a continuous intravenous infusion of vasopressin neither controlled bleeding nor altered outcome.

摘要

60例活动性上消化道出血患者被随机分为两组,分别接受持续静脉输注血管加压素(29例)或安慰剂(31例),速率为40 U/h。研究开始6小时后,血管加压素组有13例患者、安慰剂组有11例患者停止出血(p = 0.46)。到24小时时,血管加压素组有17例患者、安慰剂组有14例患者停止出血(p = 0.30)。将分析局限于静脉曲张出血患者,6小时或24小时后血管加压素治疗并无优势。在30个月的研究期间,未发现使用血管加压素止血有一致的趋势。两组在需要手术的患者数量(血管加压素组13例,安慰剂组18例;p = 0.30)或死亡人数(血管加压素组8例,安慰剂组11例;p = 0.51)方面差异不大;输血需求相同。在我们的患者中,持续静脉输注血管加压素既不能控制出血,也不能改变结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验