• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布洛芬与安慰剂及吲哚美辛治疗类风湿关节炎的短期对照研究。

Short-term study of indoprofen in comparison with placebo and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Delbarre F

出版信息

Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):66-73.

PMID:7042364
Abstract

The results of a multicentre, double-blind trial are reported, where the effectiveness and safety of indoprofen (IP) were compared with indomethacin (IM) and placebo (PL), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. After an initial "wash-out" period (3 days), each patient was given each of the three treatments for one week, in randomized sequence. The total dose of indoprofen (tablets) was 800 mg/die and that of indomethacin (capsules) 200 mg/die, in 4 daily doses after the main meals. The evaluation of effectiveness on a cumulative group of 102 cases from 18 centres showed statistically significant differences in favour of both active drugs compared to placebo, based on a series of objectives and subjective criteria. There was no significant difference between IP and IM, but on factorial analysis of correspondences, IP showed a greater difference from placebo. The patient's judgments also suggested that IP (800 mg/die) was slightly more effective than IM (100 mg/die). Adverse reactions were observed in 8.9% of the patients on IM treatment, 3.9% on IP and in 39% on PL. Laboratory variables showed no significant changes in the course of treatment.

摘要

本文报告了一项多中心双盲试验的结果,该试验比较了吲哚洛芬(IP)、吲哚美辛(IM)和安慰剂(PL)在类风湿性关节炎患者中的有效性和安全性。在初始“洗脱”期(3天)后,每位患者按随机顺序接受三种治疗,每种治疗为期一周。吲哚洛芬(片剂)的总剂量为800mg/天,吲哚美辛(胶囊)为200mg/天,均在主餐后分4次服用。基于一系列客观和主观标准,对来自18个中心的102例患者进行累积分析,结果显示与安慰剂相比,两种活性药物均具有统计学上的显著差异。IP和IM之间无显著差异,但对应分析表明,IP与安慰剂的差异更大。患者的判断也表明,IP(800mg/天)比IM(100mg/天)略有效。接受IM治疗的患者中8.9%出现不良反应,IP治疗者为3.9%,PL治疗者为39%。治疗过程中实验室指标无显著变化。

相似文献

1
Short-term study of indoprofen in comparison with placebo and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.布洛芬与安慰剂及吲哚美辛治疗类风湿关节炎的短期对照研究。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):66-73.
2
Double-blind multicentre, between patients comparison of indoprofen and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis patients under basic steroid treatment.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):135-43.
3
Indoprofen versus indomethacin and placebo. A double-blind three-way cross-over trial in rheumatoid arthritis.吲哚洛芬与吲哚美辛及安慰剂对照:类风湿关节炎的双盲三向交叉试验
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):74-8.
4
Results of a double-blind study with indomethacin and indoprofen, a new non-steroidal antirheumatic agent.
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):79-86.
5
A comparison of indoprofen and indomethacin in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.
Pharmatherapeutica. 1984;3(10):637-41.
6
Double-blind multicentre, between patients comparison of two different doses of indoprofen and one of indomethacin in osteoarthritis.双盲多中心研究,针对骨关节炎患者比较两种不同剂量的吲哚美辛与一种吲哚美辛的疗效。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):118-25.
7
Indoprofen compared with naproxen and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.吲哚洛芬与萘普生和安慰剂治疗类风湿性关节炎的比较。
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):87-92.
8
Double-blind, cross-over, international multicentre investigation of two doses of indoprofen compared with ASA and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis.双盲、交叉、国际多中心研究:比较两剂吲哚美辛与阿司匹林及安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):53-9.
9
[Short term study of comparing indoprofen with a placebo and with indomethacin in rheumatic polyarthritis].
Rev Esp Reum Enferm Osteoartic. 1979;22(4):307-28.
10
Long-term, double-blind, between patients comparison of indoprofen and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.吲哚洛芬与吲哚美辛治疗类风湿性关节炎的长期、双盲、患者间比较
Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):126-34.