Suppr超能文献

布洛芬与安慰剂及吲哚美辛治疗类风湿关节炎的短期对照研究。

Short-term study of indoprofen in comparison with placebo and indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Delbarre F

出版信息

Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1981;4(1):66-73.

PMID:7042364
Abstract

The results of a multicentre, double-blind trial are reported, where the effectiveness and safety of indoprofen (IP) were compared with indomethacin (IM) and placebo (PL), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. After an initial "wash-out" period (3 days), each patient was given each of the three treatments for one week, in randomized sequence. The total dose of indoprofen (tablets) was 800 mg/die and that of indomethacin (capsules) 200 mg/die, in 4 daily doses after the main meals. The evaluation of effectiveness on a cumulative group of 102 cases from 18 centres showed statistically significant differences in favour of both active drugs compared to placebo, based on a series of objectives and subjective criteria. There was no significant difference between IP and IM, but on factorial analysis of correspondences, IP showed a greater difference from placebo. The patient's judgments also suggested that IP (800 mg/die) was slightly more effective than IM (100 mg/die). Adverse reactions were observed in 8.9% of the patients on IM treatment, 3.9% on IP and in 39% on PL. Laboratory variables showed no significant changes in the course of treatment.

摘要

本文报告了一项多中心双盲试验的结果,该试验比较了吲哚洛芬(IP)、吲哚美辛(IM)和安慰剂(PL)在类风湿性关节炎患者中的有效性和安全性。在初始“洗脱”期(3天)后,每位患者按随机顺序接受三种治疗,每种治疗为期一周。吲哚洛芬(片剂)的总剂量为800mg/天,吲哚美辛(胶囊)为200mg/天,均在主餐后分4次服用。基于一系列客观和主观标准,对来自18个中心的102例患者进行累积分析,结果显示与安慰剂相比,两种活性药物均具有统计学上的显著差异。IP和IM之间无显著差异,但对应分析表明,IP与安慰剂的差异更大。患者的判断也表明,IP(800mg/天)比IM(100mg/天)略有效。接受IM治疗的患者中8.9%出现不良反应,IP治疗者为3.9%,PL治疗者为39%。治疗过程中实验室指标无显著变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验