Joller P W, Babo C, Hitzig W H
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1982 Feb 27;112(9):304-10.
Three platelet counting methods, i.e. the phase contrast microscopic method, the Thrombocounter (Coulter) and Thrombocell 1000 (Contraves), have been analyzed and compared. Critical evaluation of the results showed marked superiority of the electronic systems over microscopic counting regarding reproducibility and time requirement. The simplicity of sample preparation, which requires no hematocrit correction, and the availability of a capillary blood method renders the Thrombocell 1000 superior to the Coulter Thrombocounter.
对三种血小板计数方法,即相差显微镜法、血细胞计数器(库尔特)和血栓细胞计数仪1000型(康特拉维斯)进行了分析和比较。对结果的严格评估表明,在可重复性和时间要求方面,电子系统明显优于显微镜计数。样本制备简单,无需进行红细胞压积校正,且有毛细血管血检测方法,使得血栓细胞计数仪1000型优于库尔特血细胞计数器。