Goerttler K, Ehemann V, Tschahargane C, Stoehr M
J Histochem Cytochem. 1977 Jul;25(7):560-4. doi: 10.1177/25.7.70447.
We collected prostatic glands from 50 unselected autopsies at the Pathology Institute and compared their histologic sections with cytologic preparations and with results of photometric measurements of isolated prostatic cells and isolated nuclei. The results obtained with single cell photometry and flow-through cytophotometry proved to be comparable with one another and with the results of the cytologic and histologic studies. With these methods of cytophotometry we could differentiate inflammatory conditions, microcarcinomas and frank carcinomas from normal and hyperplastic prostatic tissue. We had difficulties, however, preparing adequate suspensions of cell nuclei from chronic fibrosing prostatitis. Our results indicate that it should be possible for diagnostic purposes to combine the technique of fine needle biopsy of the prostate with that of flow-through cytophotometry and to use the combined techniques for studying diseases of other organs.
我们从病理研究所的50例未经挑选的尸检中收集了前列腺,并将其组织切片与细胞学标本以及分离的前列腺细胞和细胞核的光度测量结果进行了比较。单细胞光度测量法和流式细胞光度测量法所获得的结果相互之间以及与细胞学和组织学研究的结果具有可比性。通过这些细胞光度测量方法,我们能够区分炎症状态、微癌和明显的癌与正常及增生性前列腺组织。然而,我们在从慢性纤维性前列腺炎中制备足够的细胞核悬液时遇到了困难。我们的结果表明,为了诊断目的,将前列腺细针活检技术与流式细胞光度测量法相结合,并将这两种技术用于研究其他器官的疾病应该是可行的。