Suppr超能文献

西诺沙星与复方新诺明治疗尿路感染的比较。

Comparison of cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

作者信息

de Jersey P, Wooller H O

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1982 Mar 20;1(6):267-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1982.tb132296.x.

Abstract

A randomised single-blind clinical trial compared cinoxacin (500 mg every 12 hours) to co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim, 800 mg sulphamethoxazole every 12 hours) in the treatment of 63 patients with urinary tract infections. The symptomatic response was 73% for both drugs. Bacterial eradication was achieved in 81% and 100% of patients receiving cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole respectively. Three patients receiving co-trimoxazole stopped treatment because of adverse reactions. We conclude that cinoxacin is an effective and safe antibacterial agent in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

摘要

一项随机单盲临床试验将西诺沙星(每12小时500毫克)与复方新诺明(每12小时160毫克甲氧苄啶、800毫克磺胺甲恶唑)用于63例尿路感染患者的治疗进行了比较。两种药物的症状缓解率均为73%。接受西诺沙星和复方新诺明治疗的患者细菌清除率分别为81%和100%。3例接受复方新诺明治疗的患者因不良反应而停止治疗。我们得出结论,西诺沙星是治疗尿路感染的一种有效且安全的抗菌药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验