• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西诺沙星与复方新诺明治疗尿路感染的比较。

Comparison of cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

作者信息

de Jersey P, Wooller H O

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1982 Mar 20;1(6):267-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1982.tb132296.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1982.tb132296.x
PMID:7045606
Abstract

A randomised single-blind clinical trial compared cinoxacin (500 mg every 12 hours) to co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim, 800 mg sulphamethoxazole every 12 hours) in the treatment of 63 patients with urinary tract infections. The symptomatic response was 73% for both drugs. Bacterial eradication was achieved in 81% and 100% of patients receiving cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole respectively. Three patients receiving co-trimoxazole stopped treatment because of adverse reactions. We conclude that cinoxacin is an effective and safe antibacterial agent in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

摘要

一项随机单盲临床试验将西诺沙星(每12小时500毫克)与复方新诺明(每12小时160毫克甲氧苄啶、800毫克磺胺甲恶唑)用于63例尿路感染患者的治疗进行了比较。两种药物的症状缓解率均为73%。接受西诺沙星和复方新诺明治疗的患者细菌清除率分别为81%和100%。3例接受复方新诺明治疗的患者因不良反应而停止治疗。我们得出结论,西诺沙星是治疗尿路感染的一种有效且安全的抗菌药物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.西诺沙星与复方新诺明治疗尿路感染的比较。
Med J Aust. 1982 Mar 20;1(6):267-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1982.tb132296.x.
2
A comparison of cinoxacin and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of cystitis.
Clin Ther. 1982;4(6):510-4.
3
Re: comparison of cinoxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.关于:西诺沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗尿路感染的比较
J Urol. 1982 Jul;128(1):156. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52805-0.
4
Management of the urethral syndrome in general practice.
Practitioner. 1985 Jan;229(1399):47-9.
5
Comparison of cinoxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.
J Urol. 1981 Jun;125(6):825-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55220-9.
6
[Comparative study with cinoxacin, a new drug for the treatment of urinary tract infections].[与西诺沙星(一种治疗尿路感染的新药)的对比研究]
Acta Urol Belg. 1980 Apr;48(2):299-302.
7
Trimethoprim and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections: patient compliance and efficacy.甲氧苄啶和复方新诺明治疗急性尿路感染:患者依从性和疗效
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 May;31(226):274-8.
8
Cinoxacin and trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of infections of the urinary tract: a clinical comparison.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1982 Aug;81(12):843-5.
9
[Comparative evaluation of cinoxacin, cotrimoxazole and pipemidic acid in recurrent infections of the lower urinary tract in long-term therapy].
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1987 Apr-Jun;39(2):129-34.
10
Norfloxacin versus cotrimoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections--a multi-centre trial.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 May;13 Suppl B:89-94. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.suppl_b.89.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole): an updated review of its antibacterial activity and clinical efficacy.复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑):抗菌活性及临床疗效的最新综述
Drugs. 1982 Dec;24(6):459-518. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198224060-00002.
2
Cinoxacin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of urinary tract infections.西诺沙星。其药理学特性及治疗尿路感染疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1983 Jun;25(6):544-69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198325060-00002.