Andrewes D A, Chuter P J, Dawson M J, Eden B W, Moore R M, Freestone D S, Morris C A
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 May;31(226):274-8.
Patient compliance and drug efficacy and side-effects were compared in two groups of patients with symptoms of acute lower urinary tract infections. One group was treated with trimethoprim, one tablet (300 mg) once a day, and the other with co-trimoxazole, two tablets (160 mg trimethoprim, 800 mg sulphamethoxazole) twice a day; both treatments were prescribed for seven days. Patient compliance was significantly greater with trimethoprim: corrected percentage compliance rates were 97.5 per cent for trimethoprim and 79.1 per cent for co-trimoxazole (p<0.05). Trimethoprim and co-trimoxazole were of equivalent effectiveness in the control of symptoms. Side-effects were more frequent with co-trimoxazole, but the difference was not significant.
在两组有急性下尿路感染症状的患者中比较了患者依从性、药物疗效及副作用。一组患者接受甲氧苄啶治疗,每日一片(300毫克);另一组接受复方新诺明治疗,每日两片(160毫克甲氧苄啶,800毫克磺胺甲恶唑),每日两次;两种治疗均持续7天。甲氧苄啶组患者的依从性显著更高:甲氧苄啶组校正后的依从率为97.5%,复方新诺明组为79.1%(p<0.05)。在控制症状方面,甲氧苄啶和复方新诺明疗效相当。复方新诺明的副作用更常见,但差异不显著。