• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普萘洛尔与维拉帕米治疗劳力型心绞痛的双盲随机试验。

A double-blind randomized trial of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of effort angina.

作者信息

Sadick N N, Tan A T, Fletcher P J, Morris J, Kelly D T

出版信息

Circulation. 1982 Sep;66(3):574-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.574.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.66.3.574
PMID:7046990
Abstract

In 18 patients with stable effort angina, verapamil, 80 mg four times daily, was compared with propranolol, 80 mg four times daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effects on anginal threshold, exercise capacity and left ventricular function measured by gated equilibrium blood pool scanning. Both propranolol and verapamil improved exercise capacity (placebo 424 +/- 135 W-min; propranolol 513 +/- 168 W-min, p less than 0.01; verapamil 545 +/- 215 W-min, p less than 0.005) and prolonged the time to 1 mm of ST depression (placebo 4.5 +/- 1.3 minutes; propranolol 7.4 +/- 1.4 minutes, p less than 0.005; verapamil 6.6 +/- 1.9 minutes, p less than 0.005). At rest, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction did not change significantly during drug therapy (placebo 57 +/- 13%, propranolol 55 +/- 12%, verapamil 55 +/- 13%). While taking placebo, all 18 patients had a decrease in exercise ejection fraction. In contrast, 12 patients taking propranolol and 14 patients taking verapamil had a 5% or greater increase in ejection fraction during exercise. Verapamil is an effective primary therapy and a satisfactory alternative to propranolol in patients with stable effort angina.

摘要

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,对18例稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者进行了研究,比较每日4次、每次80mg维拉帕米与每日4次、每次80mg普萘洛尔的疗效,以评估其对心绞痛阈值、运动能力和通过门控平衡血池扫描测量的左心室功能的影响。普萘洛尔和维拉帕米均能提高运动能力(安慰剂组424±135W-分钟;普萘洛尔组513±168W-分钟,p<0.01;维拉帕米组545±215W-分钟,p<0.005),并延长ST段压低1mm的时间(安慰剂组4.5±1.3分钟;普萘洛尔组7.4±1.4分钟,p<0.005;维拉帕米组6.6±1.9分钟,p<0.005)。静息时,药物治疗期间平均左心室射血分数无显著变化(安慰剂组57±13%,普萘洛尔组55±12%,维拉帕米组55±13%)。服用安慰剂时,所有18例患者运动时射血分数均下降。相比之下,12例服用普萘洛尔的患者和1例服用维拉帕米的患者运动时射血分数增加5%或更多。维拉帕米是稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者的一种有效初始治疗药物,也是普萘洛尔的一种令人满意的替代药物。

相似文献

1
A double-blind randomized trial of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of effort angina.普萘洛尔与维拉帕米治疗劳力型心绞痛的双盲随机试验。
Circulation. 1982 Sep;66(3):574-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.574.
2
Calcium channel blockade as primary therapy for stable angina pectoris. A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of verapamil and propranolol.钙通道阻滞剂作为稳定型心绞痛的主要治疗方法。维拉帕米与普萘洛尔的双盲安慰剂对照比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Nov;50(5):1158-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90437-4.
3
Comparative effects of propranolol and verapamil alone and in combination on left ventricular function and volumes in patients with chronic exertional angina: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study with radionuclide ventriculography.普萘洛尔与维拉帕米单独及联合应用对慢性劳力性心绞痛患者左心室功能和容积的比较影响:一项采用放射性核素心室造影的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、交叉研究。
Circulation. 1983 Dec;68(6):1280-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.6.1280.
4
Propranolol-verapamil versus propranolol-nifedipine in severe angina pectoris of effort: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):281-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90361-3.
5
Comparison of oral propranolol and verapamil for combined systemic hypertension and angina pectoris. A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized crossover trial.口服普萘洛尔与维拉帕米治疗合并系统性高血压和心绞痛的比较。一项安慰剂对照双盲随机交叉试验。
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Nov;50(5):1164-72. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90438-6.
6
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris.普萘洛尔与维拉帕米治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照比较
Am J Med. 1981 Sep;71(3):443-51. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90180-7.
7
Verapamil in stable effort angina: effects on left ventricular function evaluated with exercise radionuclide ventriculography.维拉帕米治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛:运动放射性核素心室造影评估其对左心室功能的影响
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Feb 1;49(2):425-30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90520-3.
8
Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of propranolol in combination with verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem in exertional angina pectoris: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study.普萘洛尔联合维拉帕米、硝苯地平及地尔硫䓬治疗劳力性心绞痛的临床及血流动力学评估:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机、交叉研究
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Mar 1;55(6):680-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90136-5.
9
[Verapamil versus propranolol in stable effort angina. Randomized, crossed, double-blind study].维拉帕米与普萘洛尔治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛的对比。随机、交叉、双盲研究
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1988 Apr;37(4):205-10.
10
The clinical and hemodynamic effects of propranolol, pindolol and verapamil in the treatment of exertional angina pectoris.普萘洛尔、吲哚洛尔和维拉帕米治疗劳力性心绞痛的临床及血流动力学效应。
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Jun 1;130(11):1449-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Discovery and Development of Calcium Channel Blockers.钙通道阻滞剂的发现与研发
Front Pharmacol. 2017 May 29;8:286. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00286. eCollection 2017.
2
Verapamil: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in coronary artery disease.维拉帕米:其药理特性及在冠状动脉疾病中的治疗应用综述
Drugs. 1996 May;51(5):792-819. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651050-00007.
3
A double blind placebo controlled comparison of verapamil, atenolol, and their combination in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.
维拉帕米、阿替洛尔及其联合用药治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的双盲安慰剂对照比较
Br Heart J. 1987 Apr;57(4):336-43. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.4.336.
4
Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials.钙通道拮抗剂。第二部分:三种典型钙通道拮抗剂在缺血性心脏病中的应用及比较特性,包括基于41项试验分析的推荐意见。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Jan;1(5):461-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02125731.
5
Comparison of the antianginal efficacy of four calcium antagonists and propranolol in stable angina pectoris.四种钙拮抗剂与普萘洛尔治疗稳定型心绞痛的抗心绞痛疗效比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;37(4):325-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00558494.