• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[针对从尿路感染分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌药物对比研究]

[Compared studies of antimicrobial agents against E. coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Proteus isolated from urinary tract infections].

作者信息

Kosakai N, Igari J, Kumamoto Y, Sakai S, Nishio A, Nagai T, Shigeta S, Shiraiwa Y, Abe K, Tazaki H, Iri H, Uchida H, Ando Y, Furuya H, Matsuda S, Soeda N, Yokomatsu M, Oguri T, Furusawa T, Takeuchi Y, Tsuchida H, Yamashita N, Okamoto Y, Shimoe S, Kamiki T, Nasu M, Yamaguchi K

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1982 Apr;35(4):1022-44.

PMID:7047795
Abstract

In vitro activities of antibacterial agents against E. coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Proteus which were isolated from patients urinary tract infections at 8 hospitals in Japan, were investigated by agar dilution method from July to October in 1979. The summarized results are as follows. 1. Among oral antibacterial agents, MPC and PPA have showed potent antibacterial activities against E. coli and Klebsiella. Among parenteral antibiotics, CTM was the most active against E. coli and Klebsiella. However, ABPC-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella have appeared to occupy about 40% and 96% of bacteria isolated from urinary tract infections, respectively. 2. In vitro activities of antibacterial agents against Proteus and Citrobacter showed not so potent. 3. Causative organisms in female patients with simple urinary tract infections were mainly E. coli and Klebsiella. 4. Among oral antibacterial agents, PPA have shown similar antimicrobial activities against E. coli isolated from simple and complicated urinary tract infections. ABPC and MPC have been influenced in some degree by these factors. However, parenteral antibiotics are not influenced by these factors. On the other hand, in vitro activities of antibacterial agents against Klebsiella isolated from simple and complicated urinary tract infections were similar.

摘要

1979年7月至10月,采用琼脂稀释法对从日本8家医院的患者尿路感染中分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌进行了抗菌剂的体外活性研究。总结结果如下。1. 在口服抗菌剂中,MPC和PPA对大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌显示出较强的抗菌活性。在注射用抗生素中,CTM对大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌的活性最强。然而,耐ABPC的大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌分别占从尿路感染中分离出的细菌的约40%和96%。2. 抗菌剂对变形杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌的体外活性不强。3. 单纯性尿路感染女性患者的病原体主要是大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌。4. 在口服抗菌剂中,PPA对从单纯性和复杂性尿路感染中分离出的大肠杆菌显示出相似的抗菌活性。ABPC和MPC在一定程度上受这些因素影响。然而,注射用抗生素不受这些因素影响。另一方面,抗菌剂对从单纯性和复杂性尿路感染中分离出的克雷伯菌的体外活性相似。

相似文献

1
[Compared studies of antimicrobial agents against E. coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Proteus isolated from urinary tract infections].[针对从尿路感染分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌药物对比研究]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1982 Apr;35(4):1022-44.
2
[Comparison of antibacterial potencies of oral and parenteral antibiotic preparations against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Proteus isolated from urinary tract infections (3: 1981) 1. Susceptibility distribution].[口服与胃肠外抗生素制剂对从尿路感染分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌效力比较(3:1981) 1. 敏感性分布]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jun;36(6):1469-503.
3
[Comparison of antibacterial potencies of oral and parenteral antibiotic preparations against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Proteus isolated from urinary tract infections (3: 1981). 2. Changes in bacterial sensitivities].[口服和胃肠外抗生素制剂对从尿路感染中分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌效力比较(3:1981)。2. 细菌敏感性的变化]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jun;36(6):1504-20.
4
[Comparison of antibacterial potencies of oral and parenteral antibiotic preparations against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Proteus isolated from urinary tract infections (3. 1981). 3. Patient backgrounds and bacterial sensitivities].[口服和胃肠外抗生素制剂对从尿路感染分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌效力比较(1981年3月)。3. 患者背景和细菌敏感性]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jun;36(6):1521-43.
5
[Comparative studies of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1984). III. Secular changes in susceptibility].[1984年抗微生物剂对从尿路感染分离出的病原体的比较研究。III. 敏感性的长期变化]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Nov;39(11):3019-93.
6
[Comparison of antibacterial activity of oral antibacterial agents against recently isolated bacteria of E. coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter and Proteus from clinical materials of urinary tract infection (author's transl)].口服抗菌剂对近期从尿路感染临床材料中分离出的大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、柠檬酸杆菌和变形杆菌的抗菌活性比较(作者译)
Jpn J Antibiot. 1981 Jun;34(6):959-75.
7
[Comparative studies of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1983). I. Susceptibility distribution].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1985 Aug;38(8):2185-229.
8
[Comparative studies of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1984). I. Susceptibility distribution].[1984年针对从尿路感染中分离出的病原体的抗菌药物比较研究。I. 药敏分布]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Nov;39(11):2959-3006.
9
[Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1992). I. Susceptibility distribution].[1992年抗微生物剂对从尿路感染分离出的病原体的活性比较研究。I. 敏感性分布]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1995 Nov;48(11):1627-57.
10
[Comparative studies of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1982). I. Susceptibility distribution].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Apr;37(4):680-722.