Morris R T, Holtum E A, Curry D S
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1982 Jul;70(3):298-304.
An evaluation was conducted at the University of Iowa Health Sciences Library to determine what effect the user's presence had on MEDLINE search results. One hundred users participated over a four-month period. Three main criteria were used: search precision, search recall, and user satisfaction. Each MEDLINE search was processed twice, once prior to the user's arrival and a second time during the scheduled appointment with the user. The two searches for each user were processed by different searchers, and four searchers alternated processing the user-absent or the user-present search. Users were asked to compare the citations on the two searchers by checking each printout for relevant citations. A short questionnaire was administered to determine general information about users and satisfaction measures for each search. The extensiveness of the interview for the user-absent search was varied in order to determine if the depth of the initial interview would affect the search results. Evaluation of the findings indicated an increase in precision, recall, and user satisfaction for the user-present search. Some difficulties in designing the experiment are discussed and implications of the evaluation results are considered.
爱荷华大学健康科学图书馆进行了一项评估,以确定用户在场对MEDLINE搜索结果有何影响。在四个月的时间里,有100名用户参与。使用了三个主要标准:搜索精度、搜索召回率和用户满意度。每次MEDLINE搜索都处理两次,一次在用户到达之前,另一次在与用户的预定预约期间。每个用户的两次搜索由不同的搜索人员处理,四名搜索人员轮流处理无用户在场或有用户在场的搜索。要求用户通过检查每份打印输出中的相关引文来比较两次搜索的引文。发放了一份简短的问卷,以确定用户的一般信息以及每次搜索的满意度指标。对无用户在场搜索的访谈深度有所不同,以确定初始访谈的深度是否会影响搜索结果。对结果的评估表明,有用户在场的搜索在精度、召回率和用户满意度方面有所提高。讨论了实验设计中的一些困难,并考虑了评估结果的影响。