Hayashi S, Miyazaki M, Toda N
Br J Pharmacol. 1980 Mar;68(3):473-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb14561.x.
1 Pretreatment of dogs for 20 to 24 h before the start of experiments with reserpine (0.5 mg/kg) depleted noradrenaline from cerebral and mesenteric arteries, the diminution being greater in the latter arteries. 2 Contractile responses of helically-cut strips of cerebral and mesenteric arteries to noradrenaline were unaffected by pretreatment with reserpine. Tyramine-induced contractions of mesenteric arteries were markedly attenuated by reserpine-pretreatment, whereas the contraction of cerebral arteries was not influenced. The contractile response of mesenteric arteries to transmural nerve stimulation or nicotine was abolished by reserpine-pretreatment, but the relaxation induced by nicotine of cerebral arteries contracted with prostaglandin F2 alpha was not affected. Pretreatment with reserpine attenuated the contractions of mesenteric arteries induced by angiotensin II, but did not alter the response of cerebral arteries to 5-hydroxytryptamine. 3 In prostaglandin-contracted cerebral and mesenteric arterial strips, relaxant effects of acetylcholine, isoprenaline and K+ were not significantly influenced by reserpine-pretreatment. 4 It appears that tyramine and nicotine do not release noradrenaline from dog cerebral arteries in amounts sufficient to cause significant contractions. Attenuation of the response to angiotensin II by pretreatment with reserpine is not the result of depletion of noradrenaline from the mesenteric arterial wall but may be due to interference with the mechanism specific to actions of angiotensin II.
1 在实验开始前,用利血平(0.5毫克/千克)对狗进行20至24小时的预处理,可使脑动脉和肠系膜动脉中的去甲肾上腺素减少,后者动脉中的减少更为明显。2 脑动脉和肠系膜动脉螺旋形切片对去甲肾上腺素的收缩反应不受利血平预处理的影响。利血平预处理可使酪胺诱导的肠系膜动脉收缩明显减弱,而脑动脉的收缩则不受影响。利血平预处理可消除肠系膜动脉对跨壁神经刺激或尼古丁的收缩反应,但尼古丁对用前列腺素F2α收缩的脑动脉的舒张作用不受影响。利血平预处理可减弱血管紧张素II诱导的肠系膜动脉收缩,但不改变脑动脉对5-羟色胺的反应。3 在前列腺素收缩的脑动脉和肠系膜动脉条中,乙酰胆碱、异丙肾上腺素和钾的舒张作用不受利血平预处理的显著影响。4 似乎酪胺和尼古丁从狗脑动脉中释放的去甲肾上腺素量不足以引起明显的收缩。利血平预处理使对血管紧张素II的反应减弱不是由于肠系膜动脉壁去甲肾上腺素的耗竭,而可能是由于干扰了血管紧张素II作用特有的机制。