Rinke W J, David B D, Bjoraker W T
J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Feb;80(2):139-47.
Data were obtained from 269 employers of entry-level dietitians regarding their specific perceptions of the importance and adequacy of preparation for 69 administrative competencies provided in internship (I), coordinated undergraduate (C), traineeship (T), and advanced degree (A) programs. Sixty-three competencies were rated as important for entry-level performance. Preparation ratings indicated that 41, 55, 81, and 96 percent of all competencies were rated as inadequate or somewhat adequate for the routes I, T, A, and C, respectively. Differences among the routes for mean adequacy ratings across all competencies were highly significant. The direction of the mean ratings was I greater than T greater than A greater than C. Differences between specific routes for mean adequacy ratings across all competencies were highly significant for I greater than C, I greater than T, I greater than A and T greater than C, but not for T greater than A and A greater than C.
数据来自269位初级营养师的雇主,内容涉及他们对实习(I)、本科协调课程(C)、见习(T)和高级学位(A)项目中所提供的69项管理能力的重要性及准备充分程度的具体看法。63项能力被评定为对初级工作表现很重要。准备充分程度评级显示,所有能力中分别有41%、55%、81%和96%被评定为在I、T、A和C路径下准备不足或准备还算充分。所有能力的平均充分程度评级在各路径之间的差异非常显著。平均评级的顺序为I大于T大于A大于C。所有能力的平均充分程度评级在特定路径之间的差异,对于I大于C、I大于T、I大于A和T大于C来说非常显著,但对于T大于A和A大于C来说则不显著。