Suppr超能文献

诊断性刮宫:重新评估

Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal.

作者信息

Grimes D A

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jan 1;142(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32276-1.

Abstract

Diagnostic dilation and curettage (D & C) is widely considered to be the method of choice for obtaining samples of endometrium for histologic examination, although the scientific basis for this assumption is elusive. Despite extensive use of D & C, the tissue yield and diagnostic accuracy of this technique have not been adequately evaluated. More is known about these features of a newer diagnostic procedure, Vabra aspiration (VA). VA also appears to be safer, less expensive, and more convenient than D & C. Until the alleged benefits of diagnostic D & C can be shown to outweigh its risks and costs (approaching one billion dollars per year in the United States alone), D & C probably should not be the primary procedure used for obtaining most samples of endometrium.

摘要

诊断性刮宫术(D&C)被广泛认为是获取子宫内膜样本进行组织学检查的首选方法,尽管这一假设的科学依据并不明确。尽管D&C被广泛应用,但其组织获取量和诊断准确性尚未得到充分评估。对于一种较新的诊断方法——Vabra抽吸术(VA)的这些特征,人们了解得更多。VA似乎也比D&C更安全、成本更低且更便捷。在诊断性D&C所谓的益处被证明超过其风险和成本(仅在美国每年就接近10亿美元)之前,D&C可能不应成为获取大多数子宫内膜样本的主要方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验