Barnes R W, Rittgers S E, Putney W W
Arch Surg. 1982 Jan;117(1):52-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380250034008.
A prospective study compared the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of indirect periorbital Doppler screening and direct carotid Doppler interrogation using real-time sound spectrum analysis to detect operable extracranial carotid occlusive disease. The results of noninvasive studies were compared with independently assessed contrast arteriograms of carotid arteries of patients studied for symptomatic cerebrovascular disease. Periorbital Doppler ultrasound was insensitive to carotid stenosis of less than 75% and did not distinguish operable stenosis from inoperable occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Carotid Doppler spectrum analysis was sensitive to 98% of hemodynamically significant disease and correctly discriminated 77% of carotid occlusions, 96% of stenoses larger than 50%, and 70% of stenoses of less than 50%. The predictive value for direct carotid interrogation in identifying carotid occlusion or operable stenosis was 94% and 86%, respectively. Real-time spectrum analysis of direct carotid Doppler signals substantially improves the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive identification of operable carotid artery disease.
一项前瞻性研究比较了使用实时声谱分析的间接眶周多普勒筛查和直接颈动脉多普勒检查在检测可手术治疗的颅外颈动脉闭塞性疾病方面的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。将无创研究结果与对有症状脑血管疾病患者的颈动脉进行独立评估的对比动脉造影结果进行比较。眶周多普勒超声对小于75%的颈动脉狭窄不敏感,无法区分颈内动脉可手术治疗的狭窄与不可手术治疗的闭塞。颈动脉多普勒频谱分析对98%的血流动力学显著疾病敏感,能正确鉴别77%的颈动脉闭塞、96%大于50%的狭窄以及70%小于50%的狭窄。直接颈动脉检查在识别颈动脉闭塞或可手术治疗的狭窄方面的预测价值分别为94%和86%。直接颈动脉多普勒信号的实时频谱分析显著提高了无创识别可手术治疗的颈动脉疾病的诊断准确性。