Suppr超能文献

对阻塞颈动脉分叉处病变的直接和间接评估。多普勒频谱分析与血管造影术的比较。

Direct and indirect evaluation of lesions obstructing the carotid bifurcation. A comparison of Doppler spectrum analysis with angiography.

作者信息

Floriani M, Bonardelli S, Portolani N, Giulini S M, Tambussi U, Tiberio G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 1987 Oct-Dec;6(4):375-82.

PMID:3330117
Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of real-time continuous wave (c.w.) Doppler spectrum analysis and of indirect periorbital Doppler examination for detecting carotid bifurcation disease was evaluated. The results of non-invasive studies were compared with contrast arteriograms of patients studied for symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (91%) or for asymptomatic bruits (9%). Periorbital examination was insensitive to less than 75% carotid stenoses and sensitivity to severe stenoses or occlusions was respectively 56% and 85% (mean 73%). Mean sensitivity of real-time C.W. Doppler spectrum was 93% and sensitivity to stenoses of less than 45% diameter reduction was equal to 76%, while specificity in identifying normal carotid arteries was 89% for an accuracy of the method of 91%. Positive and negative predicting values were respectively 89% and 93%. Direct Doppler interrogation of the carotid arteries with real-time C.W. Doppler spectrum analysis was able to distinguish operable stenoses from inoperable occlusions in 87% of the cases.

摘要

评估了实时连续波(c.w.)多普勒频谱分析和间接眶周多普勒检查对检测颈动脉分叉疾病的诊断准确性。将无创研究结果与因有症状性脑血管疾病(91%)或无症状性杂音(9%)而接受检查的患者的造影动脉造影结果进行了比较。眶周检查对小于75%的颈动脉狭窄不敏感,对严重狭窄或闭塞的敏感性分别为56%和85%(平均73%)。实时连续波多普勒频谱的平均敏感性为93%,对直径减少小于45%的狭窄的敏感性等于76%,而在识别正常颈动脉时的特异性为89%,该方法的准确性为91%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为89%和93%。通过实时连续波多普勒频谱分析对颈动脉进行直接多普勒询问能够在87%的病例中区分可手术的狭窄与不可手术的闭塞。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验