Greganti M A, Fletcher S W, Fletcher R H, Earp J A, Hyde A T
Arch Intern Med. 1982 Feb;142(2):325-9.
A full-time faculty in one dependent of medicine, 66 (85%) of whom are subspecialists, were surveyed to determine standards for provision and attitudes toward the teaching and practice of primary health care (PHC). A 40-item questionnaire on specific attributes of PHC provision was given to 70 eligible faculty members; 66 (94%) responded. Of 17 standards, nine were supported by 50 (75%) or more of the faculty and eight by from 24 (44%) to 48 (73%) faculty members. However, 51 faculty members (77%) indicated some discomfort with primary responsibility for the complete, ongoing care of their patients. Most frequent reasons for this discomfort were clinic inefficiency (31 votes [47%]) and competing commitments (29 votes [44%]). Few faculty indicated they did not enjoy PHC (eight [12%] of the faculty) or considered PHC inappropriate for academic physicians (ten [15%] of the faculty). These results indicate the complexity of faculty attitudes toward PHC and point to a need for departments of medicine to examine thier teaching and practice of PHC.
在一所医学院的一个下属部门中,对66名(85%)全职教员进行了调查,这些教员均为专科医生,目的是确定初级卫生保健(PHC)的教学和实践标准以及相关态度。向70名符合条件的教员发放了一份关于初级卫生保健提供具体属性的40项问卷;66名(94%)做出了回应。在17项标准中,9项得到50名(75%)或更多教员的支持,8项得到24名(44%)至48名(73%)教员的支持。然而,51名教员(77%)表示对完全负责患者的持续护理存在一些不适。造成这种不适的最常见原因是诊所效率低下(31票[47%])和相互冲突的职责(29票[44%])。很少有教员表示他们不喜欢初级卫生保健(8名[12%]教员)或认为初级卫生保健不适用于学术医生(10名[15%]教员)。这些结果表明教员对初级卫生保健态度的复杂性,并指出医学院系需要审视其初级卫生保健的教学和实践。