使用膜式导管与灌注导管系统进行尿道压力测定法的比较。
Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems.
作者信息
Schmidt R A, Witherow R, van Gool J D, Tanagho E A
出版信息
Urol Int. 1978;33(5):345-54. doi: 10.1159/000280221.
Urodynamic evaluation of urethral sphincter function can be carried out by constant carbon dioxide perfusion, constant water perfusion, or by the use of membrane catheters. A comparison of these 3 techniques was made in in vitro experiments. Results, and advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed. From all factors considered in this study--response to pressure changes, sensitivity to pressures along the urethra, and reproducibility of the profile--the membrane catheter was concluded to be superior to either of the perfusion systems.
尿道括约肌功能的尿动力学评估可通过持续二氧化碳灌注、持续水灌注或使用膜导管来进行。在体外实验中对这三种技术进行了比较。讨论了每种技术的结果以及优缺点。从本研究中考虑的所有因素——对压力变化的反应、对尿道沿线压力的敏感性以及曲线的可重复性——得出结论，膜导管优于任何一种灌注系统。
Zotero 插件