• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种助听器验配程序的比较。

Comparison of three hearing aid prescription procedures.

作者信息

Shapiro I

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):211-4. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198007000-00006
PMID:7409358
Abstract

The gain recommendations for twenty-five hearing aid condidates with sensorineural hearing loss were determined by direct measurement of most comfortable loudness level and by two different formulas which were based on air-conduction thresholds for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. At 500 Hz, one formula recommended significantly less gain than did the other two procedures. At the other frequencies, there were no systematic, clinically significant mean differences among the three methods. However, the direct measurement of most comfortable loudness level resulted in markedly greater variability in gains as a function of hearing level than did the two formula methods. This variability suggested that wherever possible, gain should be determined by most comfortable loudness level measurement rather than by prediction from pure-tone threshold.

摘要

通过直接测量最舒适响度水平以及基于500、1000、2000和4000赫兹气导阈值的两种不同公式,确定了25名感音神经性听力损失助听器候选者的增益建议。在500赫兹时,一种公式推荐的增益明显低于其他两种方法。在其他频率上,三种方法之间没有系统性的、具有临床意义的平均差异。然而,与两种公式方法相比,直接测量最舒适响度水平导致增益随听力水平变化的变异性明显更大。这种变异性表明,只要有可能,增益应通过测量最舒适响度水平来确定,而不是通过纯音阈值预测。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three hearing aid prescription procedures.三种助听器验配程序的比较。
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):211-4. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00006.
2
Comparison of hearing threshold level and most comfortable loudness level in hearing aid prescription.助听器验配中听阈水平与最舒适响度水平的比较。
Ear Hear. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198201000-00006.
3
Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.舒适响度水平:刺激效果、长期可靠性及可预测性。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Dec;32(4):816-28.
4
Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):484-93. doi: 10.1121/1.394044.
5
[Relation between comfortable loudness and maximal speech intelligibility in children with sensorineural hearing loss].[感音神经性听力损失儿童舒适响度与最大言语清晰度之间的关系]
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 1992 May-Jun(3):6-9.
6
[Categorical loudness scaling within the scope of hearing aid management].
HNO. 2000 Mar;48(3):189-94. doi: 10.1007/s001060050031.
7
A reexamination of the one-half gain rule.对二分之一增益规则的重新审视。
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):223-5. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00009.
8
Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.听力受损者对言语刺激的最舒适和最不舒适响度水平的变异性。
Ear Hear. 1989 Apr;10(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00003.
9
Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Sep;28(3):411-20. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.411.
10
Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Dec;21(4):668-81. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2104.668.