Martin F N, Shipp D B
Ear Hear. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):34-6. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198201000-00007.
Forty-five normal-hearing subjects were divided into three groups to determine the effects of listener sophistication on threshold estimates obtained with three commonly used tests for pseudohypacusis. A pure-tone Stenger test, speech Stenger test, and pure-tone delayed auditory feedback test were performed on each subject. The results indicate that increased sophistication levels allow subjects to simulate larger hearing losses on the two Stenger procedures. Sophistication level did not play a significant role in threshold determination with the delayed auditory feedback procedure, which was also found to be the closest indicator of true threshold.
45名听力正常的受试者被分为三组，以确定听者的经验水平对通过三种常用的伪听力减退测试所获得的阈值估计的影响。对每名受试者进行了纯音施滕格尔测试、言语施滕格尔测试和纯音延迟听觉反馈测试。结果表明，经验水平的提高使受试者能够在两种施滕格尔测试程序中模拟出更大的听力损失。经验水平在延迟听觉反馈测试程序的阈值确定中没有起到显著作用，该测试程序也被发现是最接近真实阈值的指标。
