Mörz R, Francesconi M, Schemper M, Rainer H, Jakesz J, Moser K
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1982;102(3):289-99. doi: 10.1007/BF00411349.
One hundred seventy-five patients with metastatic breast cancer, treated with a combination chemotherapy (Cooper regimen), were analyzed retrospectively to identify the value of the traditional prognostic parameters (disease-free interval; menopausal status; dominant site of metastatic lesion) for the stratification of patients before randomization. Response rate and survival time were not significantly affected by the disease-free interval and menopausal status. A significant difference was detected among the three categories of dominant disease (locoregional; osseous; visceral). However, an estimate of total extent of disease (according to Swenerton) was found to be the most important factor for predicting response and survival time after combination cytotoxic treatment. The differences between the dominant size of metastatic disease are mainly influenced by different size of metastatic spread. Therefore, there is found a significant correlation between the different types of dominant lesions and total extent of disease. In conclusion, the particular sites of metastatic spread seem to be of less importance than overall extent of disease in predicting the outcome. A critical evaluation of the three traditional stratification parameters and introduction of a semiquantitative estimation of total tumor burden as a new stratification parameter seems to be necessary when planning and comparing future trials.
对175例接受联合化疗(库珀方案)治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析,以确定传统预后参数(无病间期;绝经状态;转移性病变的主要部位)在随机分组前对患者分层的价值。无病间期和绝经状态对缓解率和生存时间无显著影响。在主要疾病的三类(局部区域;骨;内脏)之间检测到显著差异。然而,发现疾病总范围估计值(根据斯韦纳顿方法)是预测联合细胞毒性治疗后缓解和生存时间的最重要因素。转移性疾病主要部位大小的差异主要受转移扩散大小不同的影响。因此,发现不同类型的主要病变与疾病总范围之间存在显著相关性。总之,在预测预后方面,转移扩散的特定部位似乎不如疾病的总体范围重要。在规划和比较未来试验时,对三个传统分层参数进行批判性评估并引入肿瘤总负荷的半定量估计作为新的分层参数似乎是必要的。